From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232971F453 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 04:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727172AbeJWMpp (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:45:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:33015 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727014AbeJWMpp (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:45:45 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id u1-v6so39603wrn.0 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:24:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=44UjBsvq4iWhvYZbniIwjzJc6WF1hBYy5tFZwMup2nw=; b=CL+yLWcErP27YG8RJBhArvHIb45oUv+SDKnFQghs8qrVrFbHqahn1DdWNzFUKoK3Gg rrhEp4CGfP1/CTi2bv3YO8bAqkk2GbTsktVqoSvVGaDXoaIERQ/Z9igEJnZOJiz2Evc1 Bm4/W1w9WFv4oy6BBefCkVgn2GwN0P+at89nM5jFmH5zfFRnGLMkgqMcZoGXYLuEtaBD K/xFlHNRXSK6lD+lFYe07l4HzaG6UGlgU4IRLOl0rvvlMk/SSmu0meF0wQTmLTvKLWD5 DwNVVHJKXJ/43PVINA6ylhmnqf9yM9+C1IMYdrY4uq8fxRc0EOe+8hvJppmOxzzDGn2C 5XzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=44UjBsvq4iWhvYZbniIwjzJc6WF1hBYy5tFZwMup2nw=; b=XFBKbCHJLHZko9JPsrWuMycQ5gs2Jth0c0Pe3yaMsKYXrBUS/JsOZ4IKwsE5k521Ce 2PppJCecHfNToWWvCtrw8C1MfJQmeNjBD8qWckvmEMH9aN+kcKLAKE0Q+GfiuBalUeR9 kdHoQIl/oLSonsqg870fN4MqHrLBiG2KKVdonp3UK2jGTTZCu+DuMvnaW0lvVnB4rzAm FwCFfRfUZEv/K+dTqs0sIEFcuXZI8XEwrtJ865RdA+Ygeb9IRpFn6dm8ZZ29VcUEIWDX bZH9uD93T5jNEldMp4ga3m6zQnDJGjBJ1C3dIaKQKF3ba778u80V7g+l5ziPOxSM8jR/ RG+g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohkeffpXZxRwAWLa9dnov2Im0pE9eo959I0lBb7lVpAPo4k+awA IHz5Wq6VOgOv4954/NLwyhg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61xWahOrZmrCUnVL2L3nI8OJvSaWiE0qrbxAt0/lUuhHxtS+UdURYtx87PXvwS72fZ/8FbHhA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e607:: with SMTP id p7-v6mr48086991wrm.254.1540268648519; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (112.68.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.68.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 77-v6sm411200wmv.6.2018.10.22.21.24.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:24:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stefan Beller Cc: SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , Jeff King , git , Jonathan Tan Subject: Re: New semantic patches vs. in-flight topics [was: Re: [PATCH 00/19] Bring more repository handles into our code base] References: <20181016233550.251311-1-sbeller@google.com> <20181022173935.GG30222@szeder.dev> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:24:06 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:26:40 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller writes: > Am I overestimating or misunderstanding rerere here? Yes. > Would it be realistic for next and master branch instead of pu? > > I'd be wary for the master branch, as we may not want to rely on > spatch without review. (It can produce funny white space issues, > but seems to produce working/correct code) Yes, that is why I think it is a bit too late to do the "fixup with spatch" after merging to 'next' and 'master'.