From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8D1F5AD for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 21:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726444AbgDGVE7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:04:59 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59973 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726370AbgDGVE7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:04:59 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0063B5741D; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:04:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=GVsAAYbald8BWjSFS5EUJOK6bSM=; b=Eg/31v yAk3ihDHScXLyQ15WMVK3NBEb2zq3/Ockcqk0BZFkQZnqZ7xuTjvLuxKs9l0kBvg 4hbk7RPOZ8EWTfqCSwccRGxt7ZahLZUoxAEXIuoqSVbmgit5FkXad3JgetMtjsDr XRNvz1oPTFPggr631NjrxJF3clKFNQCa5UI50= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nBRTbvDZqTBJEkFoRrEkBusmYvuNg5Bk wT3REYBN1wQ0T7I104nbA6SXd5NCedYbvZ1b3feXJsX7NXmwRmeKU3FAddBIRPVw cDNj7QhHu1TE0t1O9Mfu9zB5hpKrAC57Z0IVLNMHpkkosjW+eIwX5eV51WtFYqVL /TbKrtbc3vQ= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB50E5741C; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:04:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68F365741B; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:04:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren Cc: Phillip Wood , Git Mailing List , Johannes Schindelin , Rohit Ashiwal , Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "Merge branch 'ra/rebase-i-more-options'"" References: <20200407141125.30872-1-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> <20200407141125.30872-2-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 14:04:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren's message of "Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:16:09 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6F28A112-7913-11EA-A425-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Elijah Newren writes: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:11 AM Phillip Wood wrote: >> >> From: Phillip Wood >> >> This reverts commit 4d924528d8bfe947abfc54ee9bd3892ab509c8cd. >> >> This is being reverted to enable some fixups for >> ra/rebase-i-more-options to be built on this commit. > > This makes sense to me, but it will be only the second 'Revert > "Revert..."' commit in all of git.git and I'm curious if Junio will be > unhappy with it. Nah, there isn't much to become unhappy about. I however suspect that the alternative would certainly be much nicer and easier to understand, which is to rebuild the 7-patch series c58ae96fc4..d82dfa7f5b but bugs already fixed, instead of doing this patch to take us back to a known buggy state and then fix the result with 5 more patches. Is that what you meant?