From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8711F8C1 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 00:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728378AbgEEAYq (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 20:24:46 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:52093 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727028AbgEEAYq (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 20:24:46 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE60DDE84; Mon, 4 May 2020 20:24:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mdn6IjlrKPT9HWhZuTxDZCXPIu4=; b=C9JGla j3ZLe2WtzKseiKHIOrI2jQq8kq7WO4jT2xdF5R9v369xgqinp7pF2YIgWDeOB6ip Hn7VygpORbd/L+GF1r0bSatMX7KaUmX8I4E6qeYz6QGrFJLwgBdi9RJ9DnN1PDDQ sa7E1Et8oj3xn9CM8kAkKEu67LFusF+3OTjl8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=IP9sAy77JFJYp8SpFEA6cfP2cm9tSz8U zxi7NnGiqjhESutwjl+I5Qzr7KYn+242rWlBSjpQtTOfZ6LC1k/NIwMBB3Gosgcq jB39ZS3mqgXqIjBnC7m1fDxChIrM6QOjkwqwRyRbE7l5x1hY/rPzMHYu+XwUR/DG CEBrw3S1MRk= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63521DDE83; Mon, 4 May 2020 20:24:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD2F2DDE82; Mon, 4 May 2020 20:24:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Taylor Blau , =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Hostetler , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] CI: limit GitHub Actions to designated branches References: <20200504150105.GB11373@coredump.intra.peff.net> <73de97dfebfccabe9f1bf32ea41aea5008a949cd.1588607262.git.congdanhqx@gmail.com> <20200504162311.GE12842@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200504215824.GC45250@syl.local> <20200504231544.GJ45250@syl.local> <20200504233512.GA39798@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 17:24:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200504233512.GA39798@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 4 May 2020 19:35:12 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D017B482-8E66-11EA-B4F8-B0405B776F7B-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 05:15:44PM -0600, Taylor Blau wrote: > >> > If this is only a reaction to what I said earlier (i.e. "building >> > everything in github.com/gitster/git/ has no value to me"), then I >> > suspect it may be an over-engineered solution to a problem that does >> > not exist, and harms people like you. I could just go there and >> > turn off GitHub Actions for that repository instead. >> >> It is a reaction to that, yes. It would be nice to have a middle-ground >> where you can run Actions on the official integration branches, but >> contributors such as myself run Actions on *every* branch of their fork. > > The problem is that there is no way for people to _not_ run on every > branch of their fork, then. It is either every branch or no branches. OK. > .... I don't like it, but I don't see any other way to let people > choose some branches but not others (that doesn't involve a one-line > yaml change at the beginning of every branch, which is an even higher > burden). True, and having to mark a commit object with "do not run CI on this", which is what I heard Travis does, is even worse.