From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] core.fsyncObjectFiles: make the docs less flippant
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:43:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv9gcs91k.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917112830.26606-3-avarab@gmail.com> ("Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason"'s message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:28:30 +0200")
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> As amusing as Linus's original prose[1] is here it doesn't really explain
> in any detail to the uninitiated why you would or wouldn't enable
> this, and the counter-intuitive reason for why git wouldn't fsync your
> precious data.
>
> So elaborate (a lot) on why this may or may not be needed. This is my
> best-effort attempt to summarize the various points raised in the last
> ML[2] discussion about this.
>
> 1. aafe9fbaf4 ("Add config option to enable 'fsync()' of object
> files", 2008-06-18)
> 2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180117184828.31816-1-hch@lst.de/
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/config/core.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
When I saw the subject in my mailbox, I expected to see that you
would resurrect Christoph's updated text in [*1*], but you wrote a
whole lot more ;-) And they are quite informative to help readers to
understand what the option does. I am not sure if the understanding
directly help readers to decide if it is appropriate for their own
repositories, though X-<.
Thanks.
[Reference]
*1* https://public-inbox.org/git/20180117193510.GA30657@lst.de/
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/config/core.txt b/Documentation/config/core.txt
> index 74619a9c03..5b47670c16 100644
> --- a/Documentation/config/core.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/config/core.txt
> @@ -548,12 +548,42 @@ core.whitespace::
> errors. The default tab width is 8. Allowed values are 1 to 63.
>
> core.fsyncObjectFiles::
> - This boolean will enable 'fsync()' when writing object files.
> -+
> -This is a total waste of time and effort on a filesystem that orders
> -data writes properly, but can be useful for filesystems that do not use
> -journalling (traditional UNIX filesystems) or that only journal metadata
> -and not file contents (OS X's HFS+, or Linux ext3 with "data=writeback").
> + This boolean will enable 'fsync()' when writing loose object
> + files. Both the file itself and its containng directory will
> + be fsynced.
> ++
> +When git writes data any required object writes will precede the
> +corresponding reference update(s). For example, a
> +linkgit:git-receive-pack[1] accepting a push might write a pack or
> +loose objects (depending on settings such as `transfer.unpackLimit`).
> ++
> +Therefore on a journaled file system which ensures that data is
> +flushed to disk in chronological order an fsync shouldn't be
> +needed. The loose objects might be lost with a crash, but so will the
> +ref update that would have referenced them. Git's own state in such a
> +crash will remain consistent.
> ++
> +This option exists because that assumption doesn't hold on filesystems
> +where the data ordering is not preserved, such as on ext3 and ext4
> +with "data=writeback". On such a filesystem the `rename()` that drops
> +the new reference in place might be preserved, but the contents or
> +directory entry for the loose object(s) might not have been synced to
> +disk.
> ++
> +Enabling this option might slow git down by a lot in some
> +cases. E.g. in the case of a naïve bulk import tool which might create
> +a million loose objects before a final ref update and `gc`. In other
> +more common cases such as on a server being pushed to with default
> +`transfer.unpackLimit` settings the difference might not be noticable.
> ++
> +However, that's highly filesystem-dependent, on some filesystems
> +simply calling fsync() might force an unrelated bulk background write
> +to be serialized to disk. Such edge cases are the reason this option
> +is off by default. That default setting might change in future
> +versions.
> ++
> +In older versions of git only the descriptor for the file itself was
> +fsynced, not its directory entry.
>
> core.preloadIndex::
> Enable parallel index preload for operations like 'git diff'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 18:48 [PATCH] enable core.fsyncObjectFiles by default Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-17 19:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-01-17 19:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-17 20:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-01-17 19:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-17 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-17 21:44 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-17 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-17 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-17 23:16 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-17 23:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-17 23:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-17 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-18 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-19 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-01-20 22:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-20 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-01-22 15:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-01-22 18:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-23 0:47 ` Jeff King
2018-01-23 5:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-23 16:17 ` Jeff King
2018-01-23 0:25 ` Jeff King
2018-01-21 21:32 ` Chris Mason
2020-09-17 11:06 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 11:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] should core.fsyncObjectFiles fsync the dir entry + docs Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 11:28 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] sha1-file: fsync() loose dir entry when core.fsyncObjectFiles Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 13:16 ` Jeff King
2020-09-17 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 14:55 ` Jeff King
2020-09-17 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 15:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-17 17:12 ` Jeff King
2020-09-17 20:37 ` Taylor Blau
2020-09-22 10:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 20:21 ` Johannes Sixt
2020-09-22 8:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-11-19 11:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-09-17 11:28 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] core.fsyncObjectFiles: make the docs less flippant Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-09-17 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-09-17 20:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2020-10-08 8:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-10-08 15:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-10-08 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-09 10:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-09-17 19:21 ` Marc Branchaud
2020-09-17 14:14 ` [PATCH] enable core.fsyncObjectFiles by default Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 15:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-01-17 20:55 ` Jeff King
2018-01-17 21:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv9gcs91k.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).