From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502671F4B4 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728592AbgIUWiC (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:38:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:55487 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727062AbgIUWiC (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:38:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064F7F6A6D; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:38:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=1gMCdUNzk7+4TjKaTpHfKuzjGF0=; b=S297AT l2SHakX6n94fh+Xs471g5xathcO2yVrP3k7EwuLobBFkwbw//P/QeB/lBBV8GCGT XZuqt7GxthU2K1O9GASlFdgmw+bKDJPriJKbHMJ9jtAzsm0C2YC0IxTdvFBSgCDD ETuncYoGGjHcVHeUt0NC+HKlBfy7hfB7F26R4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=bGQGLrWsE3zc2ZfDi18yH5NDkT3NkNOn SqbNixIpU1oM6XeDaSIJpU657ceFk5pq0tleqykqvIUk+JfBNq1vvUC74gT33cX3 4+YCLAGKtKY77gkxBGVdPG6Eo45ZOvyZaIR6rFYHzRxUzwUy5cIIRIpsgAJql6mb Vg7TJFaAaeo= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E9BF6A6C; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:38:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CE3CF6A6A; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:37:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Taylor Blau , Thomas Guyot-Sionnest , git@vger.kernel.org, dermoth@aei.ca Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] diff: Fix modified lines stats with --stat and --numstat References: <20200918113256.8699-2-tguyot@gmail.com> <20200920130945.26399-1-tguyot@gmail.com> <20200920153915.GB2726066@nand.local> <20200921192630.GA2399334@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200921222021.GA3533110@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:37:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200921222021.GA3533110@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:20:21 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 19C27C2C-FC5B-11EA-BE28-F0EA2EB3C613-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > .... I agree that other code could be depending on oid_valid in a weird > way, but IMHO that code is probably wrong to do so. But it may not be > worth digging into, if nobody has complained about the waste. Yup, that was my feeling when I wrote the message you are responding to.