From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0450A1F4B4 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728580AbgIYUdO (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:33:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:57205 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728797AbgIYUVn (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:43 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB5D9B517; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=hsCxrrfGAgsqxPCZC+tN1X5DTnw=; b=m8Vd7v TpkbZwTLEzn9B87XX4iLPHH1NbY0OFXbLVsX9Mfd1BvOxUCvwyL2p8ZcwfjfKzjX YNgvvqTzYtxIKq99dCdR0cEwFQ0HuY8E5rSU/cmVCI4rGpsyBJZPaHode1/8/nwN 1vlqQS4UomhZsfYjrbCTj9kSP+hSY9RMRQZyE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=oUB8dq8ixqz7icq2+mpAIFFxaaEXhliU +h96v6IYxOj3Ezw/ohwh8wNqI9YwEHOD8UFW8lop7cbaWZ9MRpASDW5p/QRASodM YxL2qI4xKffoGzm6KzJJ/sylUPqnL2BHOX9MgfS5swC2pkS6uFSS+vCRi34BcEfJ R5dg5MVYjZw= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618209B516; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE0AD9B514; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine Cc: shubham verma , Git List Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] t7001: use ': >' rather than 'touch' References: <20200925170256.11490-1-shubhunic@gmail.com> <20200925170256.11490-8-shubhunic@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:21:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Eric Sunshine's message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:57:40 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B8127A4E-FF6C-11EA-ABBF-01D9BED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric Sunshine writes: > In patch [5/11] you dropped whitespace following the redirection > operator, however, this patch introduces several new cases of unwanted > whitespace. > > Checking "master", I see that there are 209 instances of `: >` in > tests, but 1023 instances of `>`, which suggests that we should stick > with plain `>` rather than `: >` in this patch. Agreed on both points. Thanks for a careful review.