From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12FF1FA1A for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 22:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730545AbgKXVQt (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:16:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:53845 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730537AbgKXVQs (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:16:48 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E8FF283E; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:16:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=S5sEnX39yQNTiS5MxsMIRg8DfMA=; b=h3OqsI lCMkd0mgUohAm1BDdnga1Z0FtAwNA0Bh0KkJ8FBMLm0CsH5Mppxir7DfB7lxhCaZ 3QNanJ3/nXX38TU7OoRychJTzudiC0tSCvC8UyAOyvUdg8IbX8hCax41RWhunrdz YSCMA6AYVhMZX5q9fUKqoJ0+ocwmdK+/o6fYQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=FdnjV7ZTPhGyaCgb092uqbZLAaeV2g+x E0PjP8nx/d5DCeJIJX3p5cKBuzYTHaS7nVxuoeWRkxInJ0PIa+BUAaoh0azN/qP5 o4qtE/1UpYbHIhQnyEq4Eg5nbEyOyJ5/fnOutCLt6cW6ZKefh3WiQvYhGK4SmaLF 6c9iJhBSwRw= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9CDF283D; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:16:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D90CF283C; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:16:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] t3404: do not depend on any specific default branch name References: Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 13:16:42 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:15:49 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5A5BC7E0-2E9A-11EB-9752-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" writes: > From: Johannes Schindelin > > Now that we can override the default branch name in the tests via > `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME`, we should avoid expecting a > particular hard-coded name. > > So let's rename the initial branch immediately to `primary` and work > with that. Yes, that is probably the approach that gives us the most stable environment to work in. I like it. > Applying this patch would obsolete the change in > js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch to force the default branch > name to master in t3404. Yup, after taking these individual replacement patches, I expect that the big topic will see shrinkage, which is good. Will queue. Thanks.