From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1931F4B4 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 06:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725898AbhAPGjA (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:39:00 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:50772 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725797AbhAPGi7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:38:59 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA691086B6; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:38:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Apl2emLYu86mDzFL2JUaaZ9Ge0I=; b=KP3+Ur ZL0QHU2a+AUhK0dxUNsoVRCTdcHJhwLLQ3yAvZnQvH5Q9LQDMIphSPR3wb3NScLQ 6p+Rnyq1chfSXDkHLYsNUsRFBT6SMt/fKmMfSt/Y8ZyWTnJt/huAsvX5akVj/R3K 9gj7iMLXMo7Pj95VC12OdwQQAJUHayu1qD5HI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Mk0XNzHCqQJ8+y0Z4tvTvXH6dZTeZGeu pN9lTOdZ88yatvZ5rTcCJihPGy8UzohSlCYVfbnP5Ge5SiS69pOrgZCmYEmU6X+L o7ToePM+9tovOCpCszUZcFGQMexBxlXzvxTR0QWyFEiTLEQD7vyFJXVFHSW1yCNF 6v925TK7ed0= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560AC1086B4; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:38:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DBE61086B3; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:38:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= , SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [RFH] Introduce support for GETTEXT_POISON=rot13 References: Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:38:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:50:52 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 68F4210E-57C5-11EB-B744-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Jeff King writes: > ... >> So I dunno. You did find two spots where translations could be used. >> But if nobody actually saw them to care that they got translated, were >> they important? I may be a bit biased as somebody who would not use the >> translations in the first place, of course. > > I viewed the series with interest, mostly (i.e. 80%+) for its "fun > value"; I tend to agree with you that I doubt its usefulness. Actually, "I doubt its usefulness" is way too strong than what I really wanted to say. I was just skeptical, and I still somewhat am. I'd just need a bit more convincing ;-)