From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F3B1F953 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233234AbhKVUzQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:55:16 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64850 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229845AbhKVUzP (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:55:15 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB3BF5128; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:52:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=bJuQDDjxJkZBm7WDHf6FDoHqs0GCGr58iQ7SOQ r4tsQ=; b=F6zumRJRRrPoCVKjLMB31Cn9BeCzJa3wSRiXbBgWp91czlPcrR7dsR 5Fe7XEuRwkxrYiB2hYbHT7J7KsJ5AjfphoYXU6CnFAG6Y4d7JxQTM9ONpihMs+eD vaQDNRqaCJjex2pykN5pCVlDxas8zP02Sy8YFUlgBqfkIdqbOKn3o= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E504F5127; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:52:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A28C7F5126; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:52:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Carlo Arenas Cc: Johannes Schindelin , "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIg?= =?utf-8?B?QXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-compat-util: add a test balloon for C99 support References: <20211114211622.1465981-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <20211114211622.1465981-2-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 12:52:05 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:58:47 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0DB75422-4BD6-11EC-9EAB-62A2C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Carlo Arenas writes: > >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:27 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >>> I had an impression that it was claimed that without this, the other >>> weatherbaloon for "for (type var=..." would not fly in some of the >>> jobs we have at CI? >> >> It wouldn't if we have a CI job that tests with gcc < 5 but the last >> version of that job died with travis-ci.org > > I was wondering how Dscho's test was not failing, and that is an > easy answer to that question ;-) > > If we wanted to resurrect that CI job, we can always add it in the > CI definition anyway, so I am OK with that, too. But if we were to do so, perhaps we'd want something like what I gave at https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqy25lwa86.fsf@gitster.g/ in its place to avoid confusing people. Let me update that topic before dropping the one under discussion.