From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560E11F953 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 01:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229460AbhLUBHO (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:07:14 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:53593 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229436AbhLUBHO (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:07:14 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F8B17BB4E; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:07:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=RPUSc3oiguSioeLY/sm5B28z4gwx9dCyhbuaxh pPL/Y=; b=HUSjRGZ95j94MjElXTOzQDJxlnpTR7K0FMcntp51vESYuvUU09Uvka covkOi/tGc8DzmS4hPYoh9jsyDfEk3Zpgl3gcWEme7RfSOFHPCf1smDwzrolvBJO CoZb4gqYyv1Bck7hRld6ig3b4itDfRjsgXNLNgNHZN/WBOq+auMCY= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA38017BB4D; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:07:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAE3A17BB4C; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:07:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Glen Choo Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Tan , Josh Steadmon , Emily Shaffer , =?utf-8?Q?=C3=86var_Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0_Bjarmason?= , Philippe Blain Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] implement branch --recurse-submodules References: <20211216233324.65126-1-chooglen@google.com> <20211220233459.45739-1-chooglen@google.com> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:07:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20211220233459.45739-1-chooglen@google.com> (Glen Choo's message of "Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:34:54 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 52A3DA76-61FA-11EC-9604-C85A9F429DF0-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Glen Choo writes: > v6 fixes v5's bad rebase; it was based off a merge commit in 'seen' > instead of js/branch-track-inherit. Since v5 is mostly a no-op, I will > also include a range-diff against v4, which is the last version that > anyone except Junio would care about. > > This version is based off Josh's js/branch-track-inherit v7. Because that > is not yet in 'seen',... Thanks. js/branch/track-inherit has been using v7 since Fri Dec 17 15:47:47 2021 -0800, but unfortunately that was after the week's integration work and the 'seen' shown to the public probably did not have it. FYI at least since [*1*] was used to create 751363af (branch: add flags and config to inherit tracking, 2021-10-16), the topic js/branch-track-inherit has always been queued on top of f443b226 (Thirteenth batch, 2021-10-14). I try to keep the same base to keep things stable, unless there is a strong enough reason why we should depend on newer base commit. I've wiggled the patches to queue your v6 but haven't pushed the result out yet. Thanks. [Reference] *1*