From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AD91F44D for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=sasl header.b=vNvHfTHM; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F3D61C20DF1 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB525491F; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="vNvHfTHM" Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF97811CBD for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710539008; cv=none; b=M4n82bzS6ChBz5mtAM54KmCDC4GYJtWtFBrHC25O/NmZis6TWFzFsPYqco9ZW+IEmX/LWkWV3QsRasPf3VmWLn1sIeMt9p/pum0+stry0xiBRuwM1tRYDkvF2rup/yueHQos5QNPhOUSSEajNn5oFCI4XpCuyPc+J3JuF4hA+5g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710539008; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UcUyJWC65HcZUTceFLdm9GmRLru8pbG7nFe8N1tko1E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jL0w3fMKiqKutAr4OjDZXplx/3VhanmahlCAEV7HqHC0iJ3M55hBETco4FszgyzmAAqj2huqildsBD8wcrZ/tWChkxwqjJPH/XcIp71pnmlrpGsxMj9YQEieQr7vy+NVpnlnLeZiUzITJAXLmAdLQqsMa92BqNjRCekr1biTkxU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=vNvHfTHM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFEB3496F; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:43:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=UcUyJWC65HcZUTceFLdm9GmRLru8pbG7nFe8N1 tko1E=; b=vNvHfTHML7ahYqCHIOmL7vonrIxDsoUG6v3yof/YoAIzO1+kydDd8W Y51yykCtOswQO82mCLpLrj5qp7711TcqcAHQJFSZ5xlOsTWb9db8jFTjYJUEf7DL ePx8VvXByqdxIWoFjgZOYTAav+tqPV49sQOeF7OqkUR1Xk5WMcZoo= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171363496E; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:43:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.185.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A57263496B; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:43:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Linus Arver Cc: Linus Arver via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder , Emily Shaffer , Josh Steadmon , "Randall S. Becker" , Christian Couder , Kristoffer Haugsbakk Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Unify trailer formatting functions In-Reply-To: (Linus Arver's message of "Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:36:26 -0700") References: Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:43:18 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0A9CBCCC-E315-11EE-9078-A19503B9AAD1-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Linus Arver writes: > I realize now that it's because I copy/pasted the "Cc: ..." lines in the PR > description from > https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1632#issue-2068188239, such > that when I pasted those in for the PR description for this series at > https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1694#issue-2187804953, it > carried over the email addresses as Markdown-formatted hyperlinks. > Currently it reads > > Cc: Christian Couder [chriscool@tuxfamily.org](mailto:chriscool@tuxfamily.org) > Cc: Junio C Hamano [gitster@pobox.com](mailto:gitster@pobox.com) > Cc: Emily Shaffer [nasamuffin@google.com](mailto:nasamuffin@google.com) > cc: Josh Steadmon [steadmon@google.com](mailto:steadmon@google.com) > cc: Randall S. Becker [rsbecker@nexbridge.com](mailto:rsbecker@nexbridge.com) > cc: Christian Couder [christian.couder@gmail.com](mailto:christian.couder@gmail.com) > cc: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" [code@khaugsbakk.name](mailto:code@khaugsbakk.name) > cc: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" > > when I click on "edit", where the last line must be from your manual fix > which GGG picked up. I've cleaned up the PR description manually now, > and for this message I'm also attempting to clean up those square > brackets. The last time I asked the author with the same question, we unfortunately did not get a clear answer on what should be avoided (probably the author was happy enough with the message resulted from the updated pull request and forgot that it is more important to help others from having the same issue). Now we have an example we can point at when a similar issue arises. Thanks.