From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2EB1FD99 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754311AbcHZVaS (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:30:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:61680 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754205AbcHZVaR (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:30:17 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DBE3950A; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:27:52 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DbouP5n7/q+bkqAwLqs1u3GwZd8=; b=GwotTS k6t05ul8ZAWvkjJJ3uHjlNK07dWCkj8k+JS5nVF87KkXxxvTNFdo89mTYOyzwIxQ b3NNk+8ESBQ5keakAnbOUh3DH+yk57/KHY3x7MoGiA+QrLbnoKT2yWLZuU2ZmLYx ZukAnQYftZTyzONtSeP7RlpPW8RYZ5x1rnsrY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=R24BoEJDjHhxxnP8+e5LDcJf9pgGTI6A HuTZHPDzzn3DONrgwKhLc1s5jAf6solyFKMV1CG5gkKIYB/kT1G418LCqyBAxLVs 1lZNJWTmgwouv8bQ/1ZZv5iaHiCVB6CwhvCEFMMpUQ31mGjF/7K79NR4DrLhPLiU rLi0gf+0Tg0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311CA39509; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:27:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF9D739508; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:27:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Beat Bolli Cc: Stefan Beller , Heiko Voigt , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gitk: align the commit summary format to the documentation References: <1472230741-5161-1-git-send-email-dev+git@drbeat.li> <6afee090-fbe1-5d05-1f7e-6f0fc4901418@drbeat.li> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:27:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: <6afee090-fbe1-5d05-1f7e-6f0fc4901418@drbeat.li> (Beat Bolli's message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2016 22:27:29 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F19E0606-6BD3-11E6-8467-51057B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Beat Bolli writes: > On 26.08.16 21:16, Stefan Beller wrote: >> I agree we should fix that. > > So would you prepare a amendment to your documentation commit so that > Junio can disregard my two patches? I think the mention of gitk having a feature to easily give you a commit name in the preferred format added by your 2/2 is worth keeping. I am not Stefan, though ;-)