From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344FB2021E for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932167AbcKMBN3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:13:29 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52998 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932127AbcKMBN2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:13:28 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A2F4E3DB; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:13:27 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=A7EtJ/zzpmE6CNCXC8EpjVz8mN4=; b=HoH/vg 1cR4GB4cnb+4v7m7HT9+Jw1utC+8k9s5aiC4bL7lGUY9u/wmLfTuE91Dbaapfr4H sImzEDQG2pYe2+YKQuhMXsdJSsgLvdhkVxx8LoCk2NeTs1ZN4TLNDVMYbY+kbS65 08qbJSjhel717tvcDmfhSU+WxEQk5FzROirN0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=X3X4jj7+Zlt7ftpJUAe+0udI6OUgcXJV 2kDYaY3Fv2tNho737cV4k0txVTKxqzRSGthD23eIVSFJ04osSZ7IyA/hbmZeVaGU ged78jk5NWz7TVa3GI7EzqWItOu6fZD+hsYiwGRFPYrgxv3StYhmMuV3qMTlvZBa bSZ3WJNveEQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED38D4E3DA; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:13:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C52E4E3D8; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:13:26 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] t0021, t5615: use $PWD instead of $(pwd) in PATH-like shell variables References: <2b69d098-92ef-77b0-367a-516e9edbe257@kdbg.org> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:13:25 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:40:14 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6115D5CA-A93E-11E6-B9D8-3AB77A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Thanks. Dscho, does this fix both of these issues to you? > > Apparently it does because the CI jobs for `master` and for `next` pass. OK, thanks for a quick confirmation. > The one for `pu` still times out, of course. Earlier you said 'pu' did even not build, but do we know where this "still times out" comes from? As long as I don't merge anything prematurely, which I need to be careful about, it shouldn't impact the upcoming release, but we'd need to figure it out before moving things forward post release. Thanks.