From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/3] stash: show less information for stash push -- <pathspec>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:42:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtw6nvip1.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170320184855.x7m2gxwdqdt3lnet@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:48:55 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:51:16AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stash.sh
>> > index 9c70662cc8..59f055e27b 100755
>> > --- a/git-stash.sh
>> > +++ b/git-stash.sh
>> > @@ -299,10 +299,10 @@ push_stash () {
>> > then
>> > if test $# != 0
>> > then
>> > - git reset ${GIT_QUIET:+-q} -- "$@"
>> > + git reset -q -- "$@"
>> > git ls-files -z --modified -- "$@" |
>> > git checkout-index -z --force --stdin
>> > - git clean --force ${GIT_QUIET:+-q} -d -- "$@"
>> > + git clean --force -q -d -- "$@"
>> > else
>> > git reset --hard ${GIT_QUIET:+-q}
>> > fi
>>
>> Yup, we only said "HEAD is now at ..." in the non-pathspec case (and
>> we of course still do). We didn't report changes to which paths
>> have been reverted in (or which new paths are removed from) the
>> working tree to the original state (and we of course still don't).
>>
>> The messages from reset and clean that reports these probably do not
>> need to be shown by default to the users (they can always check with
>> "git stash show" when they are curious or when they want to double
>> check).
>
> I'm not sure if you are arguing here that the non-pathspec case should
> move to an unconditional "-q", too, to suppress the "HEAD is now at"
> message. But I think that is a good suggestion. It would make the two
> cases consistent, and it is not really adding anything of value (it is
> always just HEAD, and if you do not provide a custom message, the
> short-sha1 and subject are already in the "Saved..." line above).
I wasn't suggesting it (I was just saying that these extra messages
are not something we found necessary for consistency with the
original codepath when we added the pathspec support). I wasn't
even thinking about what the original codepath did, i.e. when the
command is run without pathspec.
I too suspect that most of the ${GIT_QUIET:+-q} can just become an
unconditional -q as you do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-20 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-17 14:50 [BUG] "git stash -- path" reports wrong unstaged changes Jeff King
2017-03-18 18:36 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-19 20:23 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] stash: show less information for stash push -- <pathspec> Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-20 17:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-20 18:48 ` Jeff King
2017-03-20 19:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-03-21 20:48 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-20 18:42 ` Jeff King
2017-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] stash: make push -p -q --no-keep-index quiet Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-20 18:55 ` Jeff King
2017-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] stash: pass the pathspec argument to git reset Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-20 19:08 ` Jeff King
2017-03-21 21:14 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-21 22:12 ` Jeff King
2017-03-21 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Re: [BUG] "git stash -- path" reports wrong unstaged changes Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-21 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] stash: don't show internal implementation details Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-21 22:14 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 21:33 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-22 21:41 ` Jeff King
2017-03-21 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] stash: pass the pathspec argument to git reset Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-21 22:19 ` Jeff King
2017-03-21 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] stash: keep untracked files intact in stash -k Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-21 22:38 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 21:46 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-03-20 18:41 ` [BUG] "git stash -- path" reports wrong unstaged changes Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtw6nvip1.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=t.gummerer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).