From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B9A1F404 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751195AbeCZTh3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:37:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:37149 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750955AbeCZTh2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:37:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id r131so10738903wmb.2 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:37:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=4lLA/aVo6rTU2g/9Asze/EHRovTiPd87PRfj6/AKtz8=; b=UKUc3JOegBXhgyA2aZsd5E7ejAaHsUQwpkFMNgbZLgsIQw8LhsXbnPKFBUmZaqufZf M8jwYYRAbkTuUj5h+gGmw4tDRTbUreDmkLlib750L9Q3bzEaSgXcqlvxKUVuSDQohxJw 70TlhRMnf0OznaWJjenIHoZvfLVhVlTPcps9NlxF6lPWgkxAWR/W79pLSt7lAXPMwUeZ cBMnh95vrFlM9Y5JfhuQC8VOzzztv43bJXWoe77sQKSXXyNWrTsFgmfShzTA7jNtWVjg DO+IDnZt5jGxx7btOEaybxjqXK8AuH2MHDNwv5Nm3sS3aH8N6fG7aqJYxQveB0RUy8dQ a7RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4lLA/aVo6rTU2g/9Asze/EHRovTiPd87PRfj6/AKtz8=; b=LxaP9UNAHf4bVj97lgW4B7jR9SVbG5dsW/9q5GcCipU9P4P3hM2J2NyufJeTy8J5rT aoO+sx4B4n8xv7RVVhhC0jVOwql2dJEjyxJ+n2PXupdxA6sOrSEUBlhUYMjyu778eBY6 rXcJ6erXozXpNwlZG/tSDookmzFE3d0+HN0KRKsgaa8QKGe53yfeVmr5qoZFhmADB8Rn uvNmf82+QrU1SpFnHZUkxM4R5FKJfAu8bnmhR302k6EPKin0XyeJC0yL7N20GfhsrZah 0T69NLDE06j8Q1is/K/S7TN7xcYDa+ABqHvjy/JArDKG9PM5ZKysINBWfJwDK7qMvaj5 /97w== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7F/5Ea4+53QiUh9lzxJ89habO+5P/DW+35O53x4L1UjHr9eAdlU 01x1HUu4K/iLxJrjImN/6H0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+knnHDAIJWWKg5iUKezuaAfNsXHrkCYgbvzeLNfDwwRmWTbtFw0DbwTOlH1AmjX55T69WvvA== X-Received: by 10.28.0.72 with SMTP id 69mr9988076wma.105.1522093046554; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (168.50.187.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.187.50.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 95sm17533894wrb.47.2018.03.26.12.37.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:37:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Wink Saville Cc: Jeff Hostetler , jeffhost@microsoft.com, Git List , Eric Sunshine , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive References: <9ca76d31-828d-0b6f-5069-375792c1f55d@jeffhostetler.com> <3d845e99-e392-a62f-b83e-33b58482fc54@jeffhostetler.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:37:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Wink Saville's message of "Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:43:46 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Wink Saville writes: > Should we add a "_Static_assert" that sizeof(uintmax_t) >= sizeof(uint64_t) ? If that expression compiles, then both types are understood by the platform. Because http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/stdint.h.html tells us: Greatest-width integer types The following type designates a signed integer type capable of representing any value of any signed integer type: intmax_t The following type designates an unsigned integer type capable of representing any value of any unsigned integer type: uintmax_t These types are required. we know what that expression evaluates to, no?