From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Stephen P. Smith" <ischis2@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org>,
"Johannes Sixt" <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] Add `human` format to test-tool
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:03:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtvi5kctv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190118061805.19086-5-ischis2@cox.net> (Stephen P. Smith's message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:18:04 -0700")
"Stephen P. Smith" <ischis2@cox.net> writes:
> Add the human format support to the test tool so that TEST_DATE_NOW
> can be used to specify the current time.
>
> A static variable is used for passing the tool specified value to
> get_date. The get_date helper function eliminates the need to
> refactor up the show_date and show_date normal functions to pass the
> time value.
Hmph. An interesting approach, but the implementation is a bit too
messy.
> diff --git a/date.c b/date.c
> index 43c3a84e25..24435b1e1d 100644
> --- a/date.c
> +++ b/date.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,28 @@ static int local_tzoffset(timestamp_t time)
> return local_time_tzoffset((time_t)time, &tm);
> }
>
> +const struct timeval *test_time = 0;
Shouldn't this be file-scope static?
Let BSS take care of initializing a variable to 0/NULL; drop " = 0"
at the end.
> +void show_date_human(timestamp_t time, int tz,
> + const struct timeval *now,
> + struct strbuf *timebuf)
> +{
> + test_time = (const struct timeval *) now;
> + strbuf_addstr( timebuf, show_date(time, tz, DATE_MODE(HUMAN)));
Style:
strbuf_addstr(timebuf, show_date(time, tz, DATE_MODE(HUMAN)));
> + test_time = (const struct timeval *) 0;
> +}
It is a shame that you introduced a nicely reusable get_time()
mechanism to let external callers of show_date() specify what time
to format, instead of the returned timestamp of gettimeofday(),
but limited its usefulness to only testing "human" format output.
If somebody wants to extend "test-tool date" for other formats, they
also have to add a similar "show_date_XXX" hack for their format.
How about doing it slightly differently? E.g.
- Get rid of show_date_human().
- Keep get_time(), but have it pay attention to GIT_TEST_TIMESTAMP
environment variable, and when it is set, use that as if it is
the returned value from gettimeofday().
- If there are gettimeofday() calls in date.c this patch did not
touch (because they were not part of the "human-format"
codepath), adjust them to use get_time() instead.
- Have "test-tool date" excersize show_date() directly.
> +static void get_time(struct timeval *now)
> +{
> + if(test_time != 0)
> + /*
> + * If show_date was called via the test
> + * interface use the test_tool time
> + */
> + *now = *test_time;
> + else
> + gettimeofday(now, NULL);
> +}
> +
> void show_date_relative(timestamp_t time, int tz,
> const struct timeval *now,
> struct strbuf *timebuf)
> @@ -228,7 +250,7 @@ static void show_date_normal(struct strbuf *buf, timestamp_t time, struct tm *tm
> /* Show "today" times as just relative times */
> if (hide.wday) {
> struct timeval now;
> - gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
> + get_time(&now);
> show_date_relative(time, tz, &now, buf);
> return;
> }
> @@ -284,7 +306,7 @@ const char *show_date(timestamp_t time, int tz, const struct date_mode *mode)
> if (mode->type == DATE_HUMAN) {
> struct timeval now;
>
> - gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
> + get_time(&now);
>
> /* Fill in the data for "current time" in human_tz and human_tm */
> human_tz = local_time_tzoffset(now.tv_sec, &human_tm);
> diff --git a/t/helper/test-date.c b/t/helper/test-date.c
> index a0837371ab..22d42a2174 100644
> --- a/t/helper/test-date.c
> +++ b/t/helper/test-date.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>
> static const char *usage_msg = "\n"
> " test-tool date relative [time_t]...\n"
> +" test-tool date human [time_t]...\n"
> " test-tool date show:<format> [time_t]...\n"
> " test-tool date parse [date]...\n"
> " test-tool date approxidate [date]...\n"
> @@ -22,6 +23,18 @@ static void show_relative_dates(const char **argv, struct timeval *now)
> strbuf_release(&buf);
> }
>
> +static void show_human_dates(const char **argv, struct timeval *now)
> +{
> + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> + for (; *argv; argv++) {
> + time_t t = atoi(*argv);
> + show_date_human(t, 0, now, &buf);
> + printf("%s -> %s\n", *argv, buf.buf);
> + }
> + strbuf_release(&buf);
> +}
> +
> static void show_dates(const char **argv, const char *format)
> {
> struct date_mode mode;
> @@ -100,6 +113,8 @@ int cmd__date(int argc, const char **argv)
> usage(usage_msg);
> if (!strcmp(*argv, "relative"))
> show_relative_dates(argv+1, &now);
> + else if (!strcmp(*argv, "human"))
> + show_human_dates(argv+1, &now);
> else if (skip_prefix(*argv, "show:", &x))
> show_dates(argv+1, x);
> else if (!strcmp(*argv, "parse"))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-18 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-31 0:31 [PATCH 0/3] Add 'human' date format Stephen P. Smith
2018-12-31 0:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-03 7:37 ` Jeff King
2019-01-03 13:19 ` Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-04 7:50 ` Jeff King
2019-01-04 13:03 ` Stephen P Smith
2019-01-06 6:19 ` Jeff King
2018-12-31 0:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add 'human' date format documentation Stephen P. Smith
2018-12-31 0:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] t0006-date.sh: add `human` date format tests Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-02 18:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-03 2:36 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2019-01-03 6:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-03 13:20 ` Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-03 21:14 ` Philip Oakley
2019-01-03 21:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-03 23:57 ` Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-03 7:44 ` Jeff King
2019-01-03 13:12 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2019-01-08 21:27 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-01-09 0:44 ` Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-09 6:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-01-10 1:50 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2019-01-18 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Re-roll of 'human' date format patch set Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-18 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Add 'human' date format Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-18 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] Remove the proposed use of auto as secondary way to specify human Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-18 18:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-19 3:44 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2019-01-18 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] Add 'human' date format documentation Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-18 18:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-18 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Add `human` format to test-tool Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-18 19:03 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-01-20 22:11 ` Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-22 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-18 6:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Add `human` date format tests Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-18 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-21 5:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Re-roll of 'human' date format patch set Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Add 'human' date format Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] Replace the proposed 'auto' mode with 'auto:' Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] Add 'human' date format documentation Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] Add `human` format to test-tool Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-22 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-21 5:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] Add `human` date format tests Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Re-roll of 'human' date format patch set Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Add 'human' date format Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Replace the proposed 'auto' mode with 'auto:' Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Add 'human' date format documentation Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Add `human` format to test-tool Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Add `human` date format tests Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Re-roll of 'human' date format patch set Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Add 'human' date format Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] Replace the proposed 'auto' mode with 'auto:' Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] Add 'human' date format documentation Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] Add `human` format to test-tool Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 5:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] Add `human` date format tests Stephen P. Smith
2019-01-21 15:04 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-22 0:53 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtvi5kctv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ischis2@cox.net \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).