From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE5A1F453 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 17:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726676AbfBGRkC (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:40:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com ([209.85.221.48]:37528 "EHLO mail-wr1-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726319AbfBGRkB (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:40:01 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id c8so774568wrs.4 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:40:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PqYXaQIA2FiGKz2hX7kUNJZMm+XyN+NMhN/gNBRObqg=; b=eZt0YTuBBPwGmgji6n5sSxU6OusSLaJTi54bk5NDhlG7JD+AuRrxEjZxf8gj3yPOjD bLRJBibkXOlbIvLGbodD2K7lt0B8fEXxZUUqfRnqjz0hg2SsVV7egM7wZf12sRmb3k08 ogv7AQBsCPr+FHXo62vZP8aoxmejNFzvQ3hvRMCXXODzjDuPVh0NNwH0nQBrqEQdNXfp eBvIqfNpdg+iZGxe51I1BZQm7smW3qomTjGgUCF9pixOZltxQd/Y/nrA/qtKIlM/n120 7xHGsUFEDg5OILv1e3KYPzyFpsS6Km9zUZioTkV6OU7NC3sTg6qAAmomRO0wdC2oVxO1 pEvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PqYXaQIA2FiGKz2hX7kUNJZMm+XyN+NMhN/gNBRObqg=; b=HV5r0Tb6YpFnzwWwASgQ6j9qmx0YarYqGjRYIA0vB198iWv/mXofwqCh7qg9MmiHE/ r/lwuHitOdRCAH/Np5reiXAaaBjuhHmG81+Ux29D9lO+ovur0EbD5m1kZD8zmRMMnCnr p0/n1+Qtxb2H2dgq5Yv76rJumVNhfUDino7s65JTyqrBxyANtkJ1o8PWrvZelPMjjATW JTGBdWz2KVazOlz9p6XBbHqk6aggozzjBOx37q12qTAvv0qF/tGaX2DDRAOZ8nYpzhHB 6EVqjPmbdm8FUFMCCWW4fAfqPC2YxsnLR4OXhrk1GZFORBMcy7HvgtAwT8PTocXn3keT o0SA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAua4lx2oLb0VMatKmk3+SxSdiGeOMcxB66VrD6W9tlgcn7/Oqw04 18QCdWCjEUIZ7THxtbeDRVU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaFPKgPpmOgzcM/43hLdwo/n9xFp8Ub2vDYcr0VUrX7t9lBlQSHxF9Eh40Hk+Woj8CDZYym7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:52cc:: with SMTP id r12mr3952257wrv.277.1549561199716; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:39:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (112.68.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.68.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12sm16447162wra.63.2019.02.07.09.39.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:39:58 -0800 (PST) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Randall S. Becker" Cc: =?utf-8?Q?'Torsten_B=C3=B6gershausen'?= , "'Johannes Schindelin'" , =?utf-8?Q?'SZEDER_G=C3=A1bor'?= , "'Jeff King'" , Subject: Re: t0025 flakey? References: <20190206104243.GJ10587@szeder.dev> <20190206171517.s5lskawpdodc74ui@tb-raspi4> <001501d4bf06$506b8640$f14292c0$@nexbridge.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:39:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: <001501d4bf06$506b8640$f14292c0$@nexbridge.com> (Randall S. Becker's message of "Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:58:08 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Randall S. Becker" writes: > On February 6, 2019 13:01, I wrote: >> On February 6, 2019 12:15, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: >> > To: Johannes Schindelin >> > ... >> > [PATCH] add: use separate ADD_CACHE_RENORMALIZE flag >> > >> > Or has it always been shaky ? >> > Does anybody know ? >> >> The NonStop port has traditionally had issues with t0025, which we tended >> to ignore because things did work. We wrote those off as bash issues in >> t0025 since they seemed to be corrected when we picked up a new bash >> version about a year ago. I will keep monitoring this, particularly when > 2.21 >> comes out. > > FYI: t0020-t0027 all passed on the NonStop port for 2.21.0-rc0 - so no > issues for us on this one. Yup, the preview has both the renormalize fix and another hotfix for it Peff made. Thanks all for quick fixes and confirmations.