git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] merge-recursive: remove unnecessary oid_eq function
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 10:35:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtv5demg4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c653a9b8d3863b3484eff224bbfbde65c250eaf0.1577856057.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 01 Jan 2020 05:20:57 +0000")

"Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>
> Back when merge-recursive was first introduced in commit 6d297f8137
> (Status update on merge-recursive in C, 2006-07-08), it created a
> sha_eq() function.  This function pre-dated the introduction of
> hashcmp() to cache.h by about a month, but was switched over to using
> hashcmp() as part of commit 9047ebbc22 (Split out merge_recursive() to
> merge-recursive.c, 2008-08-12).  In commit b4da9d62f9 (merge-recursive:
> convert leaf functions to use struct object_id, 2016-06-24), sha_eq() was
> renamed to oid_eq() and its hashcmp() call was switched to oideq().
>
> oid_eq() is basically just a wrapper around oideq() that has some extra
> checks to protect against NULL arguments or to allow short-circuiting if
> one of the arguments is NULL.  I don't know if any caller ever tried to
> call with NULL arguments, but certainly none do now which means the
> extra checks serve no purpose.  (Also, if these checks were genuinely
> useful, then they probably should be added to the main oideq() so all
> callers could benefit from them.)

Just for some historical yuck values ^W^W entertainment,
6d297f81373:merge-recursive.c shows how the function was called and
needed to prepare for NULL inputs.

I agree that today's code won't need the "two NULLs are equal, and NULL
is never equal to anything" hack.  We've come a long way ;-)


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-02 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-01  5:20 [PATCH 0/1] merge-recursive: remove unnecessary oid_eq function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-01  5:20 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-02 18:35   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-01-02 20:52   ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqtv5demg4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).