From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398331F5AE for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726949AbgFQUGS (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:06:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:62528 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726809AbgFQUGR (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:06:17 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7E9E2DDF; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:06:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=yrTXas9kN360j1aGkdNF1tuFEEM=; b=IfWpu8z8qPVCyxAqPnr3 WPr3qIJfQqQxOEQchNeeU759J2kgMyhmZn3ckGcGW5i1wAssO8D/BGKoE9y4vcGj 7PKH7KY8x11MDvY8Z4aGzOUEOJFVhoq3y6ux4Z4WfHj1btV90wW/xG4ijW4TSgkP an35zqI7Vm9e+f9e7Bh79TA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=bQ6e39nIa7f/Er1s3Rajm2NtSBYr7WkTtIGKOO+ctgB0Rx akQr1twansxrpQSxwMEcDWJr/SR38Os/yH1v/xcEAg0noAaVkNuP8sCu6sLlm7ob T0DKF4ZfhYpOLUf3MRnVXW8hVkr0hPYeZKGtD20Drvd9jddvsBif1uNdU6vmE= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D484CE2DDE; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:06:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 295A7E2DDB; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:06:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Johannes Sixt , Matt Rogers , "brian m. carlson" , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , Git Mailing List , don@goodman-wilson.com, stolee@gmail.com, Jeff King Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH 8/9] fast-export: respect the possibly-overridden default branch name References: <1efe848f2b029e572cea61cadcfe36b9d3797836.1591823971.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <20200610233912.GU6569@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> <405521ec-aed7-ff76-5b48-70e9d11018e6@kdbg.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:06:11 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FE75780A-B0D5-11EA-974D-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Yes, the trouble with `maint` did cross my mind, but I try not to > "overfit" to git/git. :-) I do not think it is overfitting; if the solution cannot even support the originating project well, there is something wrong. Most likely, I'd be tempted to rename it myself away from any name that is too similar to 'maint'; perhaps to 'stable' (or 'devo', h/t tla ;-).