From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size)
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 17:14:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtuyhzgro.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqk0zf3y8s.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:45:39 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Of course, we _could_ update the test_atom to do something magic
> only when the 'contents' atom is being asked. We notice that $2 is
> 'contents', do the usual test_expect_success for 'contents', and
> then measure the byte length of $3 ourselves and test
> 'contents:size'. That way, all the above test updates would become
> unnecessary (and the last two hunks of this patch can also go).
>
> That approach may even allow you to hide the details of sanitize-pgp
> in the updated test_atom so that the actual tests may not have to get
> updated even for signed tags.
After seeing the "wc -c" portability issues, I am now even more
inclined to say that the above is the right direction. The
portability worries can and should be encapsulated in a single
test_atom helper function, just as it can be used to hide the
differences between signed tags, annotated tags and commits.
Thanks.
>> +# We cannot use test_atom to check contents:size of signed tags due to sanitize_pgp
>> +test_tag_contents_size_pgp () {
>> + ref="$1"
>> + test_expect_success $PREREQ "basic atom: $ref contents:size" "
>> + git cat-file tag $ref | tail -n +6 | wc -c >expected &&
>> + git for-each-ref --format='%(contents:size)' $ref >actual &&
>> + test_cmp expected actual
>> + "
>> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-09 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-07 17:40 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` Christian Couder
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation: clarify 'complete message' Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-09 0:14 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-07-09 8:10 ` Christian Couder
2020-07-09 13:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-08 23:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-31 17:37 ` Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 17:45 ` [PATCH v1] t6300: fix issues related to %(contents:size) Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 17:47 ` Jeff King
2020-07-31 18:24 ` Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 20:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-31 20:30 ` Jeff King
2020-07-31 18:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 19:15 ` Jeff King
2020-07-31 17:45 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Jeff King
2020-07-31 20:12 ` Christian Couder
2020-07-31 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-31 20:40 ` Jeff King
2020-07-16 17:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtuyhzgro.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).