From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FDD1F66F for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728470AbgKUToG (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:44:06 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:63503 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728459AbgKUToF (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:44:05 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80EC10FB23; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:44:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=dv0Rqe8Cer8P YU8fmVeYaO68o6w=; b=gTysKB5jsDYx8Ych4idkZ2VwavMGXmBUFfmcbLkscHay 5WgOnXkpA4PuDHSIRrMxHnfGa9+j4ESfdfapUbvSebfV9X2NF/WBcM8DoLmHE9vG ySZaKadpTvlUJjjVWsllX964GnN8VQVf2csdDeZjtsJJQCOcSdKEtoCy+5O9m48= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Xoi9tT mwTlDVAmigiW+Xu2Lt9zpySYMZcxDBgo5wC7ADBV8RSpdCBSNv5uB75iPxJ0glN9 GPuMTa27djva4Tpwx5R5s/qhaHPx7EmIrJGrD0Ffz0/4gNaVa10omtR8fZBfkCot ojx1Cywlz3BBOvcu7wfwIE+ZN5n4Sd3FFITFI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76E910FB22; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:44:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19D2210FB20; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:44:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Luc Van Oostenryck , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gc docs: change --keep-base-pack to --keep-largest-pack References: <20200806214929.22qgjg3o2noosjuo@ltop.local> <20201120115522.23617-1-avarab@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 11:43:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20201120115522.23617-1-avarab@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFy?= =?utf-8?B?IEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:55:21 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E757C984-2C31-11EB-A249-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > The --keep-base-pack option never existed in git.git. It was the name > for the --keep-largest-pack option in earlier revisions of that series > before it landed as ae4e89e549 ("gc: add --keep-largest-pack option", > 2018-04-15). Is it a sign that this hasn't been used by or useful to our users that this documentation bug did not get noticed by anybody for the past 30 months, I wonder. "git gc -h" does report the option with correct name, which is the beauty of automation ;-) Thanks, both. Will queue, together with [2/2] which also makes sense.