Re: [PATCH 2/2] style: do not "break" in switch() after "return"

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

> Remove this unreachable code. It was found by SunCC, it's found by a
> non-fatal warning emitted by SunCC. It's one of the things it's more
> vehement about than GCC & Clang.

This is a borderline Meh to me.

I am even tempted to suggest that, unless all other case arms
return, iow, if there is even a single arm that breaks, it may even
be more future-proof to end any and all case arms that do not
fall-thru to consistently end with break.

If there is some way to fix the compiler, that may be preferrable,
but as I said, this is borderline Meh and I do not care too deeply
either way.

Thanks.

> These return/break cases are just unnecessary however, and as seen
> here the surrounding code just did a plain "return" without a "break"
> already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> ---
>  apply.c               | 2 --
>  builtin/fast-export.c | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
> index 4a4e9a0158c..668b16e9893 100644
> --- a/apply.c
> +++ b/apply.c
> @@ -3948,10 +3948,8 @@ static int check_patch(struct apply_state *state, struct patch *patch)
>  			break; /* happy */
>  		case EXISTS_IN_INDEX:
>  			return error(_("%s: already exists in index"), new_name);
> -			break;
>  		case EXISTS_IN_INDEX_AS_ITA:
>  			return error(_("%s: does not match index"), new_name);
> -			break;
>  		case EXISTS_IN_WORKTREE:
>  			return error(_("%s: already exists in working directory"),
>  				     new_name);
> diff --git a/builtin/fast-export.c b/builtin/fast-export.c
> index d2e33f50052..0a60356b06e 100644
> --- a/builtin/fast-export.c
> +++ b/builtin/fast-export.c
> @@ -923,7 +923,6 @@ static struct commit *get_commit(struct rev_cmdline_entry *e, char *full_name)
>  		if (!tag)
>  			die("Tag %s points nowhere?", e->name);
>  		return (struct commit *)tag;
> -		break;
>  	}
>  	default:
>  		return NULL;