From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC701F9FD for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231865AbhBRTct (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:32:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58967 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233978AbhBRTNJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:13:09 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D994BB0BB3; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:12:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=hdJ7lRgXrnYd TiHW7taRpkpy4g8=; b=maYhGfbwGJhvnn3xQe83sUY/2avXBtMTHP/0kPXRxaE8 zXiaTcCW0v8+VhByXqCy3yXwCJkCCCrMSyMWC7wP5dYU5FASj81DEUk+PzhmptZc Rai5sSERD3XZuQuYAJEkg+ZhZq5KKyrl3UfL7i+8FhgGi3vuV0iOzXqLLEu96Nw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=GN+CjT 5pbXHTmOMWQpdfhC6a4S2doz7Jq/eyo28R611PDMEqR46WIckBmaU5JW2nlj4BCK EI+69Fh9fnzLUQehu0baJvqcG5i12uHGauRxNglqvY4NXqwu6MvNfZh7ojTXrvgD sIwGDV9rah7ezKcIwZoWnKLIB/WPzzljO8RxE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EBAB0BB2; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:12:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 594BAB0BB1; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:12:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Tan Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] fsck: API improvements References: <87blcja2ha.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20210217194246.25342-1-avarab@gmail.com> <87zh028ctp.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:12:26 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87zh028ctp.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Thu, 18 Feb 2021 01:00:18 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3D59796E-721D-11EB-AAD1-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: >> Let's get this reviewed now, but with expectation that it will be >> rebased after the dust settles. > > Makes sense. Pending a review of this would you be interested in queuin= g > a v2 of this that doesn't conflict with in-flight topics? Not really. I am not sure your recent patches are getting sufficient review bandwidth they deserve. > Patches 01..09 & 13/14 can live conflict-free with what's in "seen" now > (I'd have made the 13th the 10th in v1 if I'd noticed). Then I could > re-roll the remainder of this once the other topics land.