From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Cc: ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GSOC] ref-filter: solve bugs caused by enumeration
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 20:20:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtungxg4y.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLTT8S9TbRWGPeGKR9=cDnaw2RMukawV48dPEK1KL0X_87udA@mail.gmail.com> (ZheNing Hu's message of "Thu, 6 May 2021 18:39:17 +0800")
ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com> writes:
>> So the fix was to see what atom it is by checking its name member?
>> Is starts_with() a reliable test? A fictitious atom "pushe" will be
>> different from "push" or "push:<something>", but will still pass
>> that test, so from the point of view of future-proofing the tests,
>> shouldn't it do the same check as the one at the beginning of
>> remote_ref_atom_parser()?
>>
>
> I think it's not necesssary. Before we call `populate_value()`, ...
I do not care if it is not needed with the "current" set of atoms we
accept. The example "pushe", which obviously will not be accepted
by today's code, was all about future-proofing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-06 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-05 15:31 [PATCH] [GSOC] ref-filter: solve bugs caused by enumeration ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-06 1:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-06 5:02 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-06 5:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-06 10:39 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-06 11:20 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-05-06 11:52 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-06 21:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-07 4:32 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-07 4:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-07 5:09 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-06 16:31 ` [PATCH v2] [GSOC] ref-filter: fix read invalid union member bug ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-08 15:26 ` [PATCH v3] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-10 7:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-10 12:35 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-10 7:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-10 12:51 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-10 15:01 ` [PATCH v4] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-11 2:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 6:28 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-11 9:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 11:47 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-11 13:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-11 13:31 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-11 15:35 ` [PATCH v5] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-12 1:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-12 10:37 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-12 12:12 ` [PATCH v6] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
2021-05-12 23:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-13 9:29 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-05-13 15:13 ` [PATCH v7] " ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtungxg4y.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=adlternative@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).