From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159431F5A0 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 22:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=Q/tVH88O; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229945AbjBIWZg (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 17:25:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58114 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229589AbjBIWZf (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 17:25:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0024328D25 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id v3so2551834pgh.4 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 14:25:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=KyYH4ORxdh/frq7tJyIXAcLM0fR350eH6xMSUm/e4Dc=; b=Q/tVH88O7jd8A9cnBpHTBb+nuNtQ57kNqhE8mG4wJE4Wj/aQd4BkE2ILXLgy+q6ajQ oTei2OX8hHbv2o9IPraayhx9jSp55k9GJ1qHLktTryFyP1YdRXue7aQNWwfKQFDkQI9k fvHoXlEh5wL4Ez2rEufuqq5BFBSf+AOlrHmPwteo8lOfCjAyLhVsXMAUbALIosuU/3tq B3Umcwx48LjhLCugWFSp9/RAN3cW7DEKi23QO8cr8J05XncFS5LiCPax4JcnReQdV1qG u1p30szHHyJXaEWY/YugBP4hopURiZTfmuESba1mx15kYtazmT8qeCy3pgwGzGQjWi+D 0IKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KyYH4ORxdh/frq7tJyIXAcLM0fR350eH6xMSUm/e4Dc=; b=Si/pMPgBMDEI8dPmy7RbctJ1pXBZ9h5ZfmFw3LE3xY3xnwvs/hsA9KRJl5Nj7wHvJK ScSM3uJzQ+3eGj+kUblVhyF3YWyqgueB9dnRSPfnpCaC793kqfEskvdaKRyPZyOIpSML jOn16BTip5gaa2JhaAGMGR2jFuFJS+45nycwC1La6+i5yHddw6Snx0FsKPjr+jOmoV+j W+6mEiqt209lF+xuZ3IVVSqbHOIQUD5scNvBX9f56gRJduVayJX777UpTTJ2C9B01YYP dWJ2CW/Gg0TkahkX71J1GgzVG+SyySduq6KCKz2BXXAgAkvMTReVsYxGgSl5rJOdTiN6 6DBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV32zwtRHdPtyCi+Kv2Zw4asDxFo0xOmOL4X5R+gJW64KeUbiRY Ya2SC7UBsTuvM9awb3L6WlNZEN5il60= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set87n4Lyiy7YIwHRSOXdx02bodIz5rlNFV/Um3b2abUBdwkUaZM78RUXFQ+FNL9w3NQ+Bk3wgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:7b82:0:b0:582:a212:d92c with SMTP id w124-20020a627b82000000b00582a212d92cmr9948294pfc.10.1675981534380; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 14:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (252.157.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.157.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z9-20020aa791c9000000b0059416691b64sm2014921pfa.19.2023.02.09.14.25.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Feb 2023 14:25:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Calvin Wan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, avarab@gmail.com, chooglen@google.com, newren@gmail.com, jonathantanmy@google.com, phillip.wood123@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] submodule: parallelize diff References: <20230207181706.363453-1-calvinwan@google.com> <20230209000212.1892457-1-calvinwan@google.com> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 14:25:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Calvin Wan's message of "Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:52:31 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Calvin Wan writes: >> By the way, how are you driving send-email when sending a >> multi-patch series with a cover letter? It seems that all >> messages in this series including its cover are marked as if they >> are replies to the cover letter of the previous round, which is a >> bit harder to follow than making only [v8 0/6] as a reply to [v7 0/X] >> and all [v8 n/6] (n > 0) to be replies to [v8 0/6]. > > I'll do that from now on -- didn't realize that make it harder to follow "a bit harder" may even have been an exaggeration. It is just being different from how other topics by many other people are formatted. Thanks.