From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8290F202DD for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 04:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751168AbdJBEXv (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2017 00:23:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59480 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751120AbdJBEXu (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2017 00:23:50 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFA4A381E; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 00:23:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=h43b/DxoiXUPhJMO0UfyTt2/aoM=; b=yTw3YZ kIO/cmAhFk33f09bfHAfdaaEf9qToZjKDgo2WkJOZMyqa7wTwVeDuwxETpkQfpev aVdZevO2JustmuSC7AFHmTwKvF/zTJFNjLPn1bI/PfQDqRoKIVqwX/5Vt0Jbnm7f 7BefgQjvK6w4xUnWIjnjfGdxEbb6vbtTAl/oI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wAzGzNTXwLYTBRde+YYGtf/xUL3AMK0O 2Q2NR6ndPwMIc2eMEB0tbGZw29sQCuT6yotYhHuBUtbJMlqH/aK1UmSY8UrW9IEB 13T6TdB2uaubOq0GLghd5sAL5r2v2zIZNBiAXVv1wwLVfqHS6XJA/MhGx5akEdqy 58LOpbzy3P4= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34A3A381D; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 00:23:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49072A381C; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 00:23:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, git@jeffhostetler.com, peartben@gmail.com, christian.couder@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Partial clone (from clone to lazy fetch in 18 patches) References: Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 13:23:48 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Tan's message of "Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:11:36 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7D24A6B2-A729-11E7-9FE2-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: > Jeff Hostetler has sent out some object-filtering patches [1] that is a > superset of the object-filtering functionality that I have (in the > pack-objects patches). I have gone for the minimal approach here, but if > his patches are merged, I'll update my patch set to use those. > > [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20170922203017.53986-6-git@jeffhostetler.com/ Sounds good. Or perhaps rebasing the other way around, if we feel that the "fsck with known-missing object" part of your series is with a better done-ness than Jeff's series (which is my impression but I has an obvious bias that I happened to have reviewed your series with finer toothed comb before I saw Jeff's series). Thanks for working well together ;-).