From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6992020467 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750729AbdJLJ4P (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:56:15 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54787 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751473AbdJLJ4O (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:56:14 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECE79F90E; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:56:13 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=n1tMeiC6sead 3kscGKbB443MJqg=; b=xmbfoY/0TKU/G7PxBxYGPJ1Grmv3GqPwRqH34RFFzXcO h5lh0oPi0VbLgzvW4WwVglNMMIE2rVG0Km+V2DEkWA8m6PiaLBZZNlEtz5n2+o2G xn8678q23IlVuqNUlB/CMvh87yoOSIvOftFBKn6L5gkv8cJRNF+cdBByVv5aIpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kjiQ4P wlhVCW1kbT9OtLxFIdzINCDLjYvjjQoQZIEjrZBZsIYJLsbVi2HGw8lT6CcS3cpi X3RN0kiXDBTV5BT6es5VArutEpxNmhNoAYL6jsCNd/h+yEGymJ9je/hQk5yEyYBM MACI2jMibsAjEIIsjpsKryqrtfVVfHYZjcQ2Y= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71319F90D; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:56:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32F0F9F90C; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:56:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?5bCP5bed5oGt5Y+y?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Takahito Ogawa Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-stash.txt: correct "git stash" behavior with no arguments References: <20171011180350.99888-1-takahito.ogawa@datagrid.co.jp> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:56:11 +0900 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IuWwj+W3neaBreWPsiIncw==?= message of "Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:54:32 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 94C560B0-AF33-11E7-8738-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =E5=B0=8F=E5=B7=9D=E6=81=AD=E5=8F=B2 writes: > As you point, > > git stash > > without any argument is equivalent to both of > > git stash save > git stash push > > . The original sentence is correct. OK. =20 Note that I was merely reacting to "Correct it." in your justification for the change, which made it sound like 'save' was incorrect. As a part of a move to deprecate 'save' and nudge users towards 'push', the change does make sense. I just wanted to make sure the change and its motivation are presented with honesty ;-).