From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Olga Telezhnaya <olyatelezhnaya@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 Outreachy] mru: use double-linked list from list.h
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 10:44:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqshdpmtm9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171002082020.c7ravpwgz45osrmz@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 2 Oct 2017 04:20:20 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> I do think there are a few ugly bits in the result (like that
> initializer for packed_git_mru :) ), so I'd prefer not to merge this
> down until we do that final step.
>
> So the big question is: who wants to do it?
>
> I think you've done a good job here, and this would count for your
> Outreachy application's contribution. But if you'd like to do that next
> step, you are welcome to.
>
> We could also consider it a #leftoverbits that perhaps some other
> Outreachy candidate would pick up[1].
>
> In the meantime, Junio, I think we'd want to queue this with the intent
> to graduate it to "pu" or possibly "next", but not "master". Then if
> somebody (Olga or another applicant) produces the endgame patch, we can
> queue it on top and move it further. And if nobody does, I can pick it
> after the application period is over.
So... do we still want to keep this in 'next', or does somebody
wants to do honors?
I'd really prefer *not* to see you or me ending up finishing it up,
but at the same time, I really hate seeing a halfway or 3/4 done
topic hanging around in 'pu'.
> [1] For those who find this mail through the archive, there's more
> discussion in this thread:
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/CAL21BmnvJSaN+Tnw7Hdc5P5biAnM5dfWR7gX5FrAG1r_D8th=A@mail.gmail.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-08 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-27 10:18 [PATCH] [Outreachy] cleanup: use list.h in mru.h and mru.c Оля Тележная
2017-09-27 11:30 ` Christian Couder
2017-09-28 8:38 ` [PATCH Outreachy] mru: use double-linked list from list.h Olga Telezhnaya
2017-09-28 11:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-09-28 20:47 ` Jeff King
2017-09-28 21:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-09-28 22:19 ` Jeff King
2017-09-28 21:04 ` Jeff King
2017-09-28 22:42 ` Jeff King
2017-09-29 7:18 ` Christian Couder
2017-09-29 7:23 ` Jeff King
2017-09-29 11:50 ` Christian Couder
2017-09-29 16:08 ` Оля Тележная
2017-09-29 20:38 ` Оля Тележная
2017-09-29 23:40 ` Jeff King
2017-09-30 18:09 ` Оля Тележная
2017-10-02 8:22 ` Jeff King
2017-09-29 23:37 ` Jeff King
2017-09-30 0:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-09-30 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Olga Telezhnaya
2017-10-02 8:20 ` Jeff King
2017-10-02 9:37 ` Оля Тележная
2017-10-03 10:10 ` Jeff King
2017-11-08 1:44 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-11-08 4:22 ` Jeff King
2017-11-10 11:51 ` Оля Тележная
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqshdpmtm9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olyatelezhnaya@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).