From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 14:27:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsh1fr8o9.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1s8zsrbq.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:59:37 +0900")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>> There is one crucial difference: the exit code.
>
> OK, and it was good that you explicitly said "with exit code 0" in
> the log message. Together with the idea to update the doc I floated
> earlier, this probably is worth documenting, too.
Heh, I am becoming sloppy in reviewing. The patch does not even
update any doc.
It is not a reason to reject the change (the change looks reasonably
simple and reviewers and those who have to look at the code to build
upon it would understand it in the current shape), but it is a
blocker for the change to be merged to 'next' and down.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-09 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-03 15:00 [PATCH 0/1] rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-03 15:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-05 8:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-05 8:36 ` Jacob Keller
2018-10-05 15:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-09 3:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-09 5:27 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-10-10 8:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-10 8:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rebase -i: clarify what happens on a failed `exec` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-10 9:46 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-10-11 8:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-12 8:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-10 8:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-11 9:08 ` Phillip Wood
2018-10-12 8:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-12 11:09 ` Phillip Wood
2018-10-12 11:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-12 13:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-12 13:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rebase -i: clarify what happens on a failed `exec` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-12 13:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2018-10-12 14:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-12 15:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Junio C Hamano
2018-10-12 15:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 3/2] rebase -i: recognize short commands without arguments Johannes Sixt
2018-10-26 1:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-26 8:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqsh1fr8o9.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).