From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthias Buehlmann <Matthias.Buehlmann@mabulous.com>,
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Subject: Re: Bug Report: Multi-line trailers containing empty lines break parsing
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:39:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsg4l3h32.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD1QG_b6ax-HodLRRcdLKgWJhPDghjLfjnyan1Zi80en7A@mail.gmail.com> (Christian Couder's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:17:46 +0100")
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
> So I thought that blank lines should not appear in the trailers. And
> if any appears, it means that the trailers should start after the last
> blank line.
I think that is a good principle to stick to.
>> > - if the second "multi:" trailer did not have the funny blank line
>> > before "_two", the expected output would still be "multi:"
>> > followed by "one two three", iow, the line after the second
>> > "multi: one" is a total no-op? If we added many more " \n" lines
>> > there, they are all absorbed and ignored? It somehow feels wrong
>>
>> That's definitely the outcome of this patch, but I agree it feels wrong.
>> I'm not sure that we define the behavior that strictly in
>> git-interpret-trailers(1), so we have some wiggle room, I guess.
>
> Any patch to relax how blank lines and other aspects of trailers
> parsing in my opinion should come with some documentation change to
> explain what we now accept and what we don't accept, and also tests to
> enforce that.
OK. But do we document clearly what we accept and we don't before
any change?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-15 21:54 Bug Report: Multi-line trailers containing empty lines break parsing Matthias Buehlmann
2021-02-16 2:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-16 18:07 ` Taylor Blau
2021-02-16 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-16 19:47 ` Taylor Blau
2021-03-23 15:17 ` Christian Couder
2021-03-23 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-03-25 7:53 ` Christian Couder
2021-03-25 9:33 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-03-25 18:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-26 10:25 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-03-25 18:08 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqsg4l3h32.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Matthias.Buehlmann@mabulous.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).