From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41AB1F953 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346633AbhK2SEd (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:04:33 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:63157 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350513AbhK2SCd (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:02:33 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A1D16D119; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:59:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=aYQVPQ21U4ZgTjgYrNptvP4jBf4mf7Qb+J2JUV 9nLgE=; b=K9+GfHKRTSjNGnJR4cHhXTR/rRKwYZcaorVKtBLtu+V3u2M0CGHea7 QRffCAiEY/9r2t0zEEZZ/viSo9NXS9mtob3YruP9LbRGftV5I6hjIjP+T/jvtRS/ KN+dGGSuVdJNJN2hplGN9fg4PuwErKq1Z8tgGFIgXzGCOYl6YSZEc= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B799816D118; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:59:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D366B16D115; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:59:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Han-Wen Nienhuys Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys Subject: Re: [PATCH] t1404: mark directory/file conflict tests with REFFILES References: Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:59:09 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:57:28 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0E258B32-513E-11EC-8C52-F327CE9DA9D6-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 8:39 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> And presumably, without REFFILES prerequisite, these operations >> would be supported? E.g. we can have 'main' branch, with 'main/1', >> 'main/2',... refs, at the same time, with reftable? That would be >> quite interesting. > > The storage format allows D/F conflicts, but transactions are checked > for not creating new D/F conflicts (depending on > the value of reftable_write_options.skip_name_check). OK. Then once we let reffiles wither and die over time, hopefully we can flip the bit and allow us to be in an interesting world ;-) Nice.