From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Michael J Gruber" <git@grubix.eu>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"Michael Haggerty" <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] t1010: assert empty output of mktree
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:38:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsfe8s56p.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230312201520.370234-5-rybak.a.v@gmail.com> (Andrei Rybak's message of "Sun, 12 Mar 2023 21:15:16 +0100")
Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com> writes:
> test_expect_success 'mktree refuses to read ls-tree -r output (1)' '
> - test_must_fail git mktree <all >actual
> + test_must_fail git mktree <all >actual &&
> + test_must_be_empty actual
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'mktree refuses to read ls-tree -r output (2)' '
> - test_must_fail git mktree <all.withsub >actual
> + test_must_fail git mktree <all.withsub >actual &&
> + test_must_be_empty actual
> '
I am ambivalent. As long as a failing command signals its failure
with its non-zero exit status value, the consumer of the output
should not blindly use the output from such a failing command. Is
there a strong reason why we want users rely on the command to be
silent when it fails?
An obvious alternative is to stop producing "actual" file, and it
might be a better idea; unless there is a good reason why we should
expect the command to be silent, that is.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-12 20:15 [PATCH v1 0/7] t: fix unused files, part 1 Andrei Rybak
2023-03-12 20:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] t1005: assert output of ls-files Andrei Rybak
2023-03-14 8:51 ` Michael J Gruber
2023-03-18 15:17 ` Andrei Rybak
2023-03-12 20:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] t1507: assert output of rev-parse Andrei Rybak
2023-03-12 20:24 ` Andrei Rybak
2023-03-12 20:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] t1006: assert error output of cat-file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-12 20:15 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] t1010: assert empty output of mktree Andrei Rybak
2023-03-13 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-03-12 20:15 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] t1302: don't create unused file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-12 20:15 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] t1400: assert output of update-ref Andrei Rybak
2023-03-12 20:15 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] t1404: don't create unused file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-13 21:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-12 20:15 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] t1507: assert output of rev-parse Andrei Rybak
2023-03-13 22:41 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] t: fix unused files, part 1 Junio C Hamano
2023-03-14 20:43 ` Andrei Rybak
2023-03-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 " Andrei Rybak
2023-03-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] t1005: assert output of ls-files Andrei Rybak
2023-03-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] t1006: assert error output of cat-file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] t1010: don't create unused files Andrei Rybak
2023-03-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] t1302: don't create unused file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] t1400: assert output of update-ref Andrei Rybak
2023-03-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] t1404: don't create unused file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-18 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] t1507: assert output of rev-parse Andrei Rybak
2023-03-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] t: fix unused files, part 1 Andrei Rybak
2023-03-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] t1005: assert output of ls-files Andrei Rybak
2023-03-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] t1006: assert error output of cat-file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] t1010: don't create unused files Andrei Rybak
2023-03-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] t1302: don't create unused file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] t1400: assert output of update-ref Andrei Rybak
2023-03-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] t1404: don't create unused file Andrei Rybak
2023-03-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] t1507: assert output of rev-parse Andrei Rybak
2023-03-28 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] t: fix unused files, part 1 Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqsfe8s56p.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@grubix.eu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=rybak.a.v@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).