From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] libify apply and use lib in am Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:04:10 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160511131745.2914-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <5734B805.8020504@kdbg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Stefan Beller , Johannes Schindelin , Eric Sunshine , Ramsay Jones , Jeff King , Karsten Blees , Matthieu Moy , Christian Couder To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 12 21:04:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vuE-0004bN-LG for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 21:04:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752672AbcELTEP (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2016 15:04:15 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59147 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752441AbcELTEO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2016 15:04:14 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5644B1A47A; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:04:12 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cLFVOqNtYOBrR6LG7z9khNM8gus=; b=INUZA0 w+CRq8did41XamgmEX0TW4DxTxLzNjpIiMQx99qk+7FzUiY8qD306+/eOUN/uUGS C2EmbvK46sv0VkY5CiF4SGXgEuLetrv/LRoY7vOXKyKg28XfeBYVO9lkCF0ZxFtd eNiCveVa0B0Mx+ygU3WX/QsZElyX5ZurRb91k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=j9E/tbZ+B8pEtaMRCGSJ7DaXlDLqaI3h sw7no3gVP4UY0hpSH5Xy82moMxUl8hBWOtudmcwPxXdXE0OF+kzt9ku+SY+QQR5K NSCaCfQvbvWbS6zO6C85rMIelfmQMweHDNu0YkBQHP7KWsjfoZW3aYgu7Y1ET0X2 ANARM/EzcCo= Received: from pb-smtp1. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA2C1A479; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:04:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C64491A478; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:04:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5734B805.8020504@kdbg.org> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Thu, 12 May 2016 19:06:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5001EDB0-1874-11E6-B591-9A9645017442-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > I'll also use it in production for a while, although I am not a git-am > consumer nor do I use git-rebase without -i, hence, my tests will > probably only show that there is no bad fall-out. It will probably only show that you do not use the part that was touched by the series ;-) As Christian said in 00/94, this probably needs to go in steps, as I do not think anybody wants to review fouteen rounds of 90+ patch series. I thought the early 40+ patches in the series were at least cursory reviewed already?