From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BE51FCA9 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753839AbcIKVwU (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Sep 2016 17:52:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:60189 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750912AbcIKVwT (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Sep 2016 17:52:19 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21563B524; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 17:52:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=m9uH6ZydgMTp7mXTyIsO6fFfdkI=; b=YRYxAC VxSfS7PrgTZQFoktIQ6RX6ONOXcxCfHYh0y/8dCcQAHsCcYtXxCQ5JLMNQmHz4TL KLU9mdy86WPYa4eu3CiBIDNzo79pw6zlj/CKMbZa3N0QLhJLFPdcrLL104vO7Clh zEcMbIaUKqlEyBMz+8bq7zawfwFSUHprEBj3M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Z39q0XT0Q3s5j2PG5UUtccjqPhQbzidv mu/vZUwEPGuKfUnMgxsAOkytpsXwRMW4yTZRHfGq2Rd0AesipbklBTXp486AC1UU ZKXahu8jDgdo85lIJcCL1KP9M7UMdf1vD6yEX25NGJm+wbErSDraHeIsoF2kz2Ug +/9P4m+T4H4= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96033B523; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 17:52:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3379B3B522; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 17:52:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Pat Thoyts Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-gui: respect commit.gpgsign again References: <550e7de5e08e53b5893e1ce021bffee468adfc9d.1473424091.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:52:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:05:32 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 02531DD6-786A-11E6-BD0C-51057B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Thanks. There are a couple more git-gui patches waiting for quite a long > time. So you prefer them still as patches to git-gui.git? I prefer not to have to worry about them myself ;-) That means that even if Pat steps down, the next maintainer for git-gui project would not be me, so I wouldn't be making a unilateral decision to re-root git-gui.git project one-level down. > Also, I just noticed poor wording. Would you mind fixing it up by > > s/committing/& with GPG signature/ Ouch, I didn't notice. It's not in 'next' yet, so let me see if I can futz with the history. Thanks.