From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C8220984 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754771AbcIMUc6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:32:58 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:57647 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754636AbcIMUc5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:32:57 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889A73D547; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:32:52 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=5PjVwkXdqmqeRXF1ePS2VdBxjv0=; b=sJKBlT cbQqC1JO2b7YHqo96HPnT4fjPo9Ug/6t7G/iZ7Mirm8ulYVAhELFGi1CO5NZZ/BW HnVJXo8Nrc0dFGcDXzXgoOdrtM7jPI2ksJ5Bck2byD9lEAIAMLAOVEGxkY4agiXg 84IwX1MwXr1fCSTJ0y5KYMfnHr27V7eT5USKk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=l8+BV5KbyAyATaC5Qj6yIPbZRxI8O/zl FutkoAoE9Qz0pwJkc4UmpM1HT8y71huQHyEPXcoGTvz15nRT5fGwRvFWDHEx6tQn /WC6Vg0ytstu6tDdy5mX98VeK7NVePtGhqKSqICXj1heL3+CtpYyZpo5SgZlvge/ IaV2w1i3pHI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3E23D546; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F40613D545; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:32:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Wong Cc: Yaroslav Halchenko , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] http: avoid repeatedly adding curl easy to curlm References: <20160913002557.10671-1-e@80x24.org> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:32:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160913002557.10671-1-e@80x24.org> (Eric Wong's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:25:54 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3E4491AC-79F1-11E6-80CA-F7BB12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric Wong writes: > The key patch here is 3/3 which seems like an obvious fix to > adding the problem of adding a curl easy handle to a curl multi > handle repeatedly. Yeah, sounds like the right thing to do and 2/3 makes it really easy to read the resulting code. > I will investigate those failures in a week or two when I regain > regular computer access. Thanks. Will tentatively queue on 'pu' and wait for updates.