From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA452079E for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 02:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932093AbdAACcu (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Dec 2016 21:32:50 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50039 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932071AbdAACcu (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Dec 2016 21:32:50 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD1F5D0CA; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 21:32:49 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=dDj3/YAGxGX/sMNdZQAOJHpHRdY=; b=FKU+vS Gmn5vJSoW08+Su5rtQy3SH8m1k5zrXgEBSA2I/s0K7AhGVf/1SutzN5sUYyICjzj j4sTwjZkGMU4osn7Mylk+LwItoBM5PitxXo1msK5k+z7UJqNNT9aZF4Kh+kicpLr 1s58LJhbsS5qVPHNss4iEfID2iiYKX7btIfE8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SVuh3vkr//BBoqKSWUMMrFxmhwTTQE1g Oacg1peNaL/4LtLOVDe2XYxh1Zql3/Cv06eKigmfRsjoSXLuqji3oPBlgylorrMI gqh2B2ZWhsLQT2cfoAMFx926wl86mh/HuA7bvyERIoeAdmbuOSwGzFXXZbQOMLag 6ieKwZLs6VM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4005D0C9; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 21:32:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C7A75D0C8; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 21:32:48 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Michael Haggerty , git@vger.kernel.org, David Turner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/23] Delete directories left empty after ref deletion References: <20161231064746.6bvis76p5x5ubc2b@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:32:47 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20161231064746.6bvis76p5x5ubc2b@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 31 Dec 2016 01:47:46 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 95E60DF8-CFCA-11E6-AB6F-E17F7A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 04:12:40AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote: > >> This is a re-roll of an old patch series. v1 [1] got some feedback, >> which I think was all addressed in v2 [2]. But it seems that v2 fell >> on the floor, and I didn't bother following up because it was in the >> same area of code that was undergoing heavy changes due to the >> pluggable reference backend work. Sorry for the long delay before >> getting back to it. > > I've read through the whole thing, and aside from a few very minor nits > (that I am not even sure are worth a re-roll), I didn't see anything > wrong. And the overall goal and approach seem obviously sound. > >> Michael Haggerty (23): > > I'll admit to being daunted by the number of patches, but it was quite a > pleasant and easy read. Thanks. > > -Peff Thanks, both. These patches indeed were pleasant.