From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440DE20A93 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S939813AbdAJSOY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:14:24 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:52714 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936586AbdAJSN1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:13:27 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BAD5D2CB; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:13:26 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ynyk5JK28FV/J1g1zaoWWFk3BUg=; b=KiL/kI OB6YMWg4FtPygenQG5h5pfOw/QvOqWV+RMsfkmU96qa4xsLwcmItpr8Rv4t1kFlM Q50fOisZT7jVdz/5rxhTWqE7BEH2ysIctlGK6YCLsn6ov/e6Y2DuAfZl2mbp1YMo Ufd2Mym7WpO3BpzYo5vwvUAUObrpCwKG4RDqY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WZH+d+mI3pAq5T2JSkXqYof/rcppZxVA nKCScdfGwatCCEwDAQe71m+VTHtONvZ3fTVPnINWHuoY+1fIIy3ExJpqjaIylq/e MTGvmb+2G0gdSEyLCEXy8o0NCudXWbNXwsQdFyTz1+afYPOBmi6E+a7am7gc6xy/ QdhZwUdMGLk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7E85D2CA; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:13:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BA885D2C6; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:13:25 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stefan Beller Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, bmwill@google.com, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCHv8] pathspec: give better message for submodule related pathspec error References: <20170109231650.9043-1-sbeller@google.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:13:24 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170109231650.9043-1-sbeller@google.com> (Stefan Beller's message of "Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:16:50 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7A9C1874-D760-11E6-9E71-FE3F13518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller writes: > This comes as a single patch again, replacing sb/pathspec-errors. > It goes directly on top of bw/pathspec-cleanup. > > v8: > cleaned white spaces in commit message > removed TEST_CREATE_SUBMODULE=yes > : > instead of touch. > > v7: > do not rely on "test_commit -C" being there, nor the infrastructure > to request a "good" submodule upstream. Just create a submodule outselves > to test in. > > Thanks, > Stefan Thanks, queued.