From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDCA203F3 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755500AbdGXUmv (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:42:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:58413 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755088AbdGXUmt (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:42:49 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AAA9AD33; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:42:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=ae7yKET52pw9 oTqs7JMQXhNEAnU=; b=SDh4nNd9Q8zvkqdjy6TUGxLU4k6Cv33wuy3THCchjZhv KU5vXdUBbStp+rx6Rj652ZsKpY+rrYzwVvMy+SsFdQ9hlygIHq/MLh1Hm2s9RH7z /1Vqmuo8ecQkaoeM/FAQZN4iu9vNL6mIRR45IPJiXyBVo3vSOTYaAdHgOqn9Vro= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=NPHK1b mswRATDKgs95ovuQ6IlfCYKseOOlt+MXkc7IELcOfgLyXXEe1RzJdLkh6Kc1zzec P0yKUjUFrww7ejW0LjZmXjHjXeA+M6aY19VgvLSRaGRZNNZLcXtynBdAnvf1YoQx /nMJDk2ndDPpz2Dsdx4n5czYUn08onDsHC6C8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02A79AD32; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:42:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 222449AD31; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:42:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: lukaszgryglicki Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] merge: add a --signoff flag. References: <0102015d0c41db74-34ff8613-05e2-44bb-a05b-2624108c36c8-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <0102015d0cf235f7-9be8e1fc-a926-4e6f-8180-c131da1c4161-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:42:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:02:26 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A74D7D2E-70B0-11E7-A403-EFB41968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > lukaszgryglicki writes: > >> Hi, what is the state of this patch? > > I was expecting you to respond to =C3=86var's <87tw2sbnyl.fsf@gmail.com= > > to explain how your new version addresses his concerns, or him to > respond to your new patch to say that it addresses his concerns > adequately. I think neither has happened, so the topic is still in > limbo, I guess... Sorry, =C3=86var's message I meant was <87fueferd4.fsf@gmail.com>.