From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523BF20437 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758081AbdJMME7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:04:59 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56152 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757670AbdJMME5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:04:57 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B238AFF8A; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:04:57 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HdWxjAg5aJoOQ8vckZwrsNlEKY8=; b=Crkt6N yFzyuNf3ittbwZFQwaKKP705Lhz9hYeYtWkDJ7O7fYpZrP6sN4xyKuI/exVMTMx3 Ff793GmbceLk1bsycGZJOyX90Ruon5NsJjIDxwvh6hmsV8uGuiVcYXGgTytAuQj8 SiQu5RjMV1GSc3LbSKgnIiMl05lKPeYhPCcu0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=i6AY+GVVxbBDQ3gvAVPGxb40k9kOoCOw 5T/2XU5FT2ACvI5UtLkDciBNXuDKRS1lI81U+dDbjNKS9SpER1fVbyl8szsOOkmN ZIzaC+exWbWH/Wmf5T6VVtQT1Q+CtPDjgXfj6/X9MvpvWROsOUN61q7VmzGJqWEh 3nE4+vzPC9k= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32504AFF89; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:04:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D9BEAFF87; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:04:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Christian Couder Cc: Mike Hommey , Constantine , git Subject: Re: git-clone causes out of memory References: <515b1400-4053-70b0-18e2-1f61ebc3b2d7@yandex.ru> <20171013100603.5eed26sjjigph2il@glandium.org> <20171013103722.rvr7536mu2hoo4wb@glandium.org> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 21:04:55 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Christian Couder's message of "Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:44:52 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BAADB36E-B00E-11E7-A492-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Christian Couder writes: > Yeah, but perhaps Git could be smarter when rev-listing too and avoid > processing files or directories it has already seen? Aren't you suggesting to optimize for a wrong case?