From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, christian.couder@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sha1_name: fix uninitialized memory errors
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:06:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr2p4kemp.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce8421bb-4519-c4e5-ff0a-98ae532d764b@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:57:26 -0500")
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:
>> I do not think they are wrong, but aren't the latter two somewhat
>> redundant? "num" is p->num_objects, and we call (first+1)th element
>> only after we see (first < num - 1), i.e. first+1 < num, and the
>> access to (first-1)th is done only when first > 0. The first one,
>> i.e. when first points at where we _would_ find it if it existed,
>> can access "first" that could be p->num_objects, so the change there
>> makes sense, though.
>
> Yes. But I'd rather keep the blocks consistent and use the return
> value of nth_packed_object_oid() when possible.
Sure, I do not think anybody minds; I just wanted a sanity check.
Thansk.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-28 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 9:04 Use of uninitialised value of size 8 in sha1_name.c Christian Couder
2018-02-26 9:53 ` Jeff King
2018-02-26 10:23 ` Christian Couder
2018-02-26 14:06 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-02-26 14:43 ` Christian Couder
2018-02-26 14:56 ` [PATCH] sha1_name: fix uninitialized memory errors Derrick Stolee
2018-02-26 20:41 ` Jeff King
2018-02-27 11:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Derrick Stolee
2018-02-27 21:33 ` Jeff King
2018-02-27 22:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-27 22:40 ` Jeff King
2018-02-28 20:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-28 20:57 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-02-28 21:06 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqr2p4kemp.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).