From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5310C1F97E for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727769AbeJKPtD (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:49:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:43003 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726008AbeJKPtD (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:49:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id g15-v6so8600963wru.9 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:22:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=WfimVTVH1nvGtXHXtutdyH0RzpAiFz3w5IXhM4t03lY=; b=bASJ85ChtSl5VEE7XLUIYKutx8x+AgiRplsUVultQEkXojq5RrVLbQu32T2iRG5gRL jc5Bg3zGcRap3fjUmvrQ5o7EMxzr5t4YAtkku833G+zeGHGNeC89/tZYQDapqXHRXiFA eYkxD2HQkU/dzOeMg2icwNjiLVR6e0mnyfPA63d0+1u2DVx7Ma2r2+rQ+ceuH6fsgPbp tCZC/izW9CJdi5EUnajn8c0YxAdQNwW8dBLuZutUvh5BSGlau6emCvvSNZuTxOIaXVEl QyECi35Dl4G5kS5f0ZEuBfY5Q+qKfZBlsnoSDQV6O1TDMab6K60JrVbldpnioTWTStn9 PZgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=WfimVTVH1nvGtXHXtutdyH0RzpAiFz3w5IXhM4t03lY=; b=SKLdOTrP/F5Un8GyzcBoq4Z+futxJHolQCN/IXnVZoRFlkAZAk74yQ+Wl8Tjh03lBk Ga4f2SQIKDkWv/G3xrTdYWZSGc93iMroXdAJ4iuQVIQZ1mR3Tosz1wSunYInf0f8d8Mf IpCPpS3mQa/tcd6POTQED8rtPq5sEG29g3Tr73gaUImDBZYifyu3ZnXC0scfvaa5VidG yGzF2Pau/6+l9Qv/21tknJE2KDrbTUX01P6VNkxyry9zm6rX5jK5LlMCyObjWR6JTKrW 9S9SsYRjBVqxstQ+QEaWWMzKjh+sHiIdw1SozQfZ+F+0/3Z+RG8S/9SN7rNTALorRx/+ RwEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoijMzY/0V2mopOBH8azDIYrHxVsQ7tk7LmdUDxRoeWqy5utEBuZ mSf0koIZdvhqFgsxfpRYRBc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61op6tHizuWZ4p81rHSzPa3lXJenyfSxW2YU4Gnx28Qz9g+0jU74dowPXU709yqRuIJRLwWAA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4b84:: with SMTP id b4-v6mr634383wrt.168.1539246170168; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (112.68.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.68.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p1-v6sm19430388wrs.40.2018.10.11.01.22.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:22:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] send-email: only consider lines containing @ or <> for automatic Cc'ing References: <20181010111351.5045-1-rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20181010111351.5045-3-rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <871s8yez74.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <7b03da07-4301-1b42-b8a2-a29e4e1f80d0@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 17:22:48 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Rasmus Villemoes's message of "Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:06:10 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Rasmus Villemoes writes: > So, it seems you're ok with this tightening, but some comment on the > non-interactive use case should be made in the commit log? Or am I > misunderstanding? I do not think we need any immediate action on this step. I was just wondering if we want two classes of "I am not running you interactively, so assume I said 'yes' when you need to ask me any confirmation on X and Y" and "I am not running you interactively, so assume I said 'no' for safety when you need to ask me any confirmation on Z" supported in the future. Lines with both @ and <> fall into the first class, while lines with only <> fall into the second camp, I would guess.