From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD27211B3 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726979AbeLEHk2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 02:40:28 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50580 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726102AbeLEHk2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 02:40:28 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BA91198BF; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 02:40:24 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=3gzJabBZSs/upC2aD+QixoIx2rQ=; b=RNisP8 Ip4Ug+cTbQD0SvNdolb2I5nvoPoHeBuSA4f6WcsPctHBJdhQWySdwVDyfWsY+ijK mJ2VMmTUXJt9VxDlBD9gxL9R2YTzqRQKh9NrBTXTXmI1Y73W/0Moxq8QYsCR1GwK eRwJWKJ3ItKSW0hGIG7N/jBhPawq0CQWsVJ9A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=x+/yjmL2npIkNq9XQqpVsZ7NEaM6Sw+p CWeg5yhBGxLKMPULa6s7b951NSkjznHh2QhdOkqmbR9/AjGJ6/9Fp0fs7JWbFNBn bnbb7SNc8MrpR6zHFIWwv/cGsBR306whmll2RzXImokJ/9ZUFq5SohDfiZ5KXcV3 X04CkmbBDSk= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CDC1198BE; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 02:40:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.155.68.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A15061198BC; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 02:40:23 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Sixt Cc: Elijah Newren , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase docs: fix incorrect format of the section Behavioral Differences References: <20181204231709.13824-1-newren@gmail.com> <76537e8b-3b66-e1f1-eb4d-e9e1c18012df@kdbg.org> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 16:40:22 +0900 In-Reply-To: <76537e8b-3b66-e1f1-eb4d-e9e1c18012df@kdbg.org> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:57:06 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0657C232-F861-11E8-B278-BFB3E64BB12D-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Sixt writes: > Please let me deposit my objection. This paragraph is not the right > place to explain what directory renme detection is and how it works > under the hood. "works fine" in the original text is the right phrase > here; if there is concern that this induces expectations that cannot > be met, throw in the word "heuristics". > > Such as: > Directory rename heuristics work fine in the merge and interactive > backends. It does not in the am backend because... OK, good enough, I guess. Or just s/work fine/is enabled/.