From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Fix fetch regression with transport helpers
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 09:13:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr286r8ts.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1906061505310.42@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet> (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 6 Jun 2019 15:07:02 +0200 (CEST)")
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>> I vaguely recall seeing just one 'x' once. I think last time I had a
>> problem with truncating st_ino, but that should be fixed in e66ceca94b
>> (clone: fix colliding file detection on APFS, 2018-11-20). So no idea
>> how this happens again.
>
> Good catch. I think the reason it happens again is simply that Junio
> picked a base commit that is older than the commit you referenced.
Yeah, that is because the patch specifically targetted a single
commit as culprit, so naturally the topic that introduced that
commit was the place to be "fixed" ;-)
I was wondering if the base commit _before_ the fixes, i.e. e198b3a7
("fetch: replace string-list used as a look-up table with a
hashmap", 2018-09-25), failed the same test you saw problems with.
It does predate e66ceca9 ("clone: fix colliding file detection on
APFS", 2018-11-20), so my current theory is that it was broken
already adn these patches that fixed a breakge had nothing to do
with the t5601 tests failing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-06 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-04 2:13 [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Fix fetch regression with transport helpers Felipe Contreras
2019-06-04 2:13 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/5] t5801 (remote-helpers): cleanup refspec stuff Felipe Contreras
2019-06-04 14:16 ` Jeff King
2019-06-04 2:13 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/5] t5801 (remote-helpers): add test to fetch tags Felipe Contreras
2019-06-04 14:22 ` Jeff King
2019-06-04 2:13 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/5] fetch: trivial cleanup Felipe Contreras
2019-06-04 2:13 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/5] fetch: make the code more understandable Felipe Contreras
2019-06-04 2:13 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/5] fetch: fix regression with transport helpers Felipe Contreras
2019-06-04 14:32 ` Jeff King
2019-06-04 19:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-06-04 14:35 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] Fix fetch " Jeff King
2019-06-04 19:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2019-06-05 8:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-06-05 11:27 ` Jeff King
2019-06-05 12:22 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-06-06 13:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-06-06 16:13 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-06-07 5:32 ` CI builds on GitGitGadget, was " Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqr286r8ts.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).