git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Han Xin <chiyutianyi@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Han Xin <hanxin.hx@alibaba-inc.com>,
	Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t5534: new test case for atomic signed push
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:34:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr1r2zslr.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915095827.52047-1-hanxin.hx@alibaba-inc.com> (Han Xin's message of "Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:58:26 +0800")

Han Xin <chiyutianyi@gmail.com> writes:

> +	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
> +	error: atomic push failed for ref refs/heads/noff. status: 2
> +	error: failed to push some refs to '"'"'dst'"'"'
> +	EOF
> +	test_i18ncmp expect actual

Another thing I forgot to say.  This expects the exact phrasing of
error message to stay the same, which is not really desirable.  We
might want to start quoting `refs/heads/noff` in the message like
other messages often do, for example, and this test will have to
match.

If you expect that the failure is not due to GPG (i.e. the updated
code in 2/2 wants to fail before asking GPG to do anything), why
not grep for what your "Fake gpg" says in the error output and make
sure that message does not appear?  That would make this test a lot
more robust, I suspect.



> +'
> +
>  test_done

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-15 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-15  9:58 Han Xin
2020-09-15  9:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] send-pack: check atomic push before running GPG Han Xin
2020-09-15 21:02   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-15 21:40     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-16  1:53     ` Jiang Xin
2020-09-16  4:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-16 11:49         ` Jiang Xin
2020-09-16 23:44           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-18  4:50             ` [PATCH v2] send-pack: run GPG after atomic push checking Han Xin
2020-09-19  0:02               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-19 14:47                 ` [PATCH v3] " Han Xin
2020-09-19 23:02                   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-20  6:20                     ` [PATCH v4] " Han Xin
2020-09-16 17:35         ` [PATCH 2/2] send-pack: check atomic push before running GPG 韩欣(炽天)
2020-09-15 20:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] t5534: new test case for atomic signed push Junio C Hamano
2020-09-16  0:34   ` brian m. carlson
2020-09-15 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqr1r2zslr.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=chiyutianyi@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hanxin.hx@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] t5534: new test case for atomic signed push' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).