From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Eric Wong" <e@80x24.org>,
"Benno Evers" <benno@bmevers.de>, "Jean Privat" <jean@pryen.org>,
"René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] test-lib functions: add an --annotated-tag option to "test_commit"
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 13:41:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr1kyo8l8.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210228195414.21372-5-avarab@gmail.com> ("Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason"'s message of "Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:54:08 +0100")
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> @@ -220,6 +225,9 @@ test_commit () {
> --no-tag)
> no_tag=yes
> ;;
> + --annotated-tag)
> + annotated_tag=yes
> + ;;
A new option is welcome, but shouldn't we be straightening out the
variables that keep track of the options around tagging? It's not
like it is possible to have 4 (two variables that can independently
set to 'yes') possibilities, so something along the lines of ...
test_commit () {
+ tag=light &&
notick= &&
...
while test $# != 0
do
case "$1" in
...
--no-tag)
- no_tag=yes
+ tag=none
;;
+ --annotated)
+ tag=annotated
+ ;;
...
- if test -z "$no_tag"
- then
+ case "$tag" in
+ none)
+ ;;
+ light)
git ${indir:+ -C "$indir") tag "${4:-$1}"
+ ;;
+ annotated)
+ git ${indir:+ -C "$indir") tag -m "$1" "${4:-$1}"
+ ;;
+ esac
...
after this step (meaning, we may want to start from fixing the no_tag=yes
to tag=none before introducing this new feature).
Thanks.
> @@ -244,7 +252,15 @@ test_commit () {
> $signoff -m "$1" &&
> if test -z "$no_tag"
> then
> - git ${indir:+ -C "$indir"} tag "${4:-$1}"
> + if test -n "$annotated_tag"
> + then
> + if test -z "$notick"
> + then
> + test_tick
> + fi &&
> + test_tick
> + fi &&
> + git ${indir:+ -C "$indir"} tag ${annotated_tag:+ -a -m "$1"} "${4:-$1}"
> fi
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-23 12:51 [PATCH] describe: dont abort too early when searching tags Benno Evers
2020-02-24 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-02-25 19:07 ` benno
2020-02-25 20:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 00/10] describe tests: refactor & fix recent broken tests Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-03-09 0:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-03-12 23:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] describe test fixes Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] describe tests: improve test for --work-tree & --dirty Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] describe tests: refactor away from glob matching Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] describe tests: don't rely on err.actual from "check_describe" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] describe tests: fix nested "test_expect_success" call Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] describe tests: support -C in "check_describe" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-12 11:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] svn tests: trivial "set -e" in main body of test fixes Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-12 11:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] svn tests: remove legacy re-setup from init-clone test Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-12 11:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] svn tests: refactor away a "set -e" in test body Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] describe tests: improve test for --work-tree & --dirty Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] describe tests: refactor away from glob matching Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-03-01 21:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] describe tests: always assert empty stderr from "describe" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-03-01 21:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] test-lib functions: add an --annotated-tag option to "test_commit" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-03-01 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-03-02 9:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-03-03 6:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] describe tests: convert setup to use test_commit Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-03-01 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] describe tests: fix nested "test_expect_success" call Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] describe tests: support -C in "check_describe" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] svn tests: remove legacy re-setup from init-clone test Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] svn tests: refactor away a "set -e" in test body Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-28 21:14 ` Eric Wong
2021-02-28 19:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] test-lib: return 1 from test_expect_{success,failure} Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-03-01 21:43 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqr1kyo8l8.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=benno@bmevers.de \
--cc=e@80x24.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jean@pryen.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).