From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2051F4D7 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 16:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="b4Szlb8i"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241783AbiFFQgN (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2022 12:36:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46418 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231325AbiFFQgK (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2022 12:36:10 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875361EAEF for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE5318ECAB; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 12:36:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Ric8GJAALeb04JFPfoG8kSGwSIkrUkjS6hgax6 pdimQ=; b=b4Szlb8iiHfZxNzuHyMorX2j0DeufY5xZU6GtzTYO7PVVKNADaIwfy e7Hq9+bD4RWoOES5yIk2DTMBn6Id3R096VJ0jEHBOWG5JuGeJ8kUc3/h67zj9dA4 a0QetvYxJGRTPePoxlXlr3K1BxHU3n2PhlaRjCYpfhzfbrkxKU2b0= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0638C18ECAA; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 12:36:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.92.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CD3F18ECA2; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 12:36:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Taylor Blau , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de, Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rebase: update branches in multi-part topic References: Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 09:36:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Phillip Wood's message of "Sat, 4 Jun 2022 16:28:39 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C2B7D5E8-E5B6-11EC-8385-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Wood writes: > Instead of using 'label' and 'exec' I'd prefer a new todo list command > ('update-ref' or 'update-branch'?) used in place of 'label' that takes > a branch name and updates the branch ref at the end of the > rebase. That would make it easy to do all the updates in a single > transaction as you suggested. Sounds like a good approach.