From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0901F54E for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="UdCWnAkQ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231436AbiHaQXT (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:23:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39520 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229882AbiHaQXS (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:23:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D88AFAC8 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 202so13918574pgc.8 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:23:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=wkkwx/fOO809T1OnCkav1G/BZv9xLdjb0Au2rac7FsA=; b=UdCWnAkQ5miYHiVUMxKrJMGy4i///Ugnm3c+RYpJtCo/icfRCSxAm412vaQ9uXn3+J idYy1ucJzVDoXWf9xBPh1BQAreXmeW2iC8BQNQFJmD87zz8w0UqQQOk7dEg4FFiJ7liX 2/yFItqNR/eRDxPE9FkL7Hk87vfwY1HHYssyOnxD3h4ACqunIurseY8u30O2+1Gai/HY PxQmVUxWdDl2cv8sr2SZlfgu7fZRsomnKsS40qyBTAQZ4G2goEXU2bPjr4oUr3PKmw2b Z7YHFg5oOP1wNec1bhylwY50BUt8YbwRKJ3JnrPKDPL9kxIAfgjL+VwXd6ilVGflrEOZ lVcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=wkkwx/fOO809T1OnCkav1G/BZv9xLdjb0Au2rac7FsA=; b=VRKelXgI9dik9LtZjPmxI1p740nDzqfqfG3nVyJ4J2ug4UGE0H6aFK5OYT4Vn8MhQn hQcUrlNWMXAdujiBkeDr7Pvab+dQkitsTJd+huvOUCtO+KJIGTG0gnwhl4ft86aNuO6b neiRcUOV13wC8znxEz0QtgeHRAqQUWRSpRhZmtUWNrpQMMj/9xpApCYQwRb9Uvc4IvpQ 343X54bGEVRCRO3o3ZE6s16cIqSFq0AvBM+IwYO+lMwdIeLGAyGGOGj6+w4XP+yeSYFE dzuFv6HtPa9e8ndnCWHb7b1F8ESGVx2LG148rMPfu3xL7ck54vq9BgHCUGxfcQ2O9JnC C6Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2ye2zUgHhga+oXAWlg9h350gdkH5xpfR028Rc56h8pph67QZoM MctbrCcfSgTio2Gq3ViiDrDLYfoQJFU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR60G4v380RN78U27jPiGzWyhD3O8wntNVmOpp+pB5KdMigZ3iAfOkI7KFEhK23+GF7qcV5FHA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a02:206:b0:427:93bb:9f99 with SMTP id bh6-20020a056a02020600b0042793bb9f99mr22331791pgb.542.1661962997097; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14-20020aa79a4e000000b00537cfbb2810sm10932008pfj.65.2022.08.31.09.23.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: jk/unused-annotation + ab/unused-annotation References: <220831.86fshcal32.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:23:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:27:00 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Yeah, I think we should use the deprecated attribute. Since the original > has been reverted, I think the next step would be for me to fix up the > patches to use that approach from the start, and re-submit. > > I was dragging my feet a little hoping that we might get some coccinelle > parsing miracle in the interim. Yup, that was why I ignored the "deprecated" one when I dealt with the replacement series yesterday.