From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB1B1FEAA for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750998AbcGSSq4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:46:56 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52318 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750722AbcGSSqz (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:46:55 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB3B2BEC6; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:46:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=JD3dp6mzJ1zmcSp2EO0rn3BEdT8=; b=Udrej4 0pYPPOznhd6UuO/5oak1Xa2NluHXGXfAYHeh7/FIdCsbn2eZepVwjXMzQyPO9WPF m0GXP/OhskCEuBsjlHT1epv2d7gBYXa1mdhRy8iDdolCkwln+Onko1I2TPLJbFFH 7Z5fVzqXN7gpaDJpq1hoOp04bleVTVe506/uk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=XDLsXp7O9eqMdO3H10/aeq9WYuwMB+ze h7UlGXyHpYU9Sh8WWqNmmv9HDTdz0SCbuDE23vdmoBzusAbPLucWefCf/67b/jFj wU2sCE7Dig6DEl0O9LQQN3mvEyZlKljLNUu4RhdKQjDjLCAbkLWChVpUXKJ78RLh /7Fi41QqaQY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0305A2BEC2; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:46:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BB242BEC1; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:46:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Duy Nguyen Cc: "brian m. carlson" , Johannes Schindelin , Herczeg Zsolt , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again) References: <20160716201313.GA298717@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> <20160717142157.GA6644@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:46:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Duy Nguyen's message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:27:02 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 292CF804-4DE1-11E6-B1D6-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Duy Nguyen writes: >> Even though that single operation might be possible, do not go >> there. A "pathname" identifies a "path", not its contents, and >> "appending crap after path" breaks the data model badly. > > I thought about that but I thought all those operations required > special treatment for submodules anyway. Operatins requiring special treatment does not make it right to break the data model anyway, so...