From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D663D2021F for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754533AbcHBWaT (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:30:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56282 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754146AbcHBWaR (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:30:17 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D9E32299; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:17:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=M/rh4RiiG97z63lDN9TaSgjpEqs=; b=dHsiqL zjkbW60JhoULkJOHpyRBPSPDKg01AWzsvWGejTw9RrAA7hQUdb1K407RakaszBfH z1lKLi7B8E1x5JJ7E/EKgqZkqNez0aiBCHz3Th+/ofpDBvPUyidko/+cZiX+BF4E 8dYQbDKVhaniNVc5kwZCb/MsWFk9cSiWX5jYI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=cuT+PNnTLOU19YRrAHPEA15JEdBGSvAI de0jisXGpbwU544Tn6iw8Qvb0ep9WfRx96/iPv6PDqh1fMY1QiafZUk4IOljiiH8 dvkjqHIXWU0x74foXLZyP41Dyn9C/e2Ys1TcaeVSAgrVsfckLBnh5mzE3q0a270p OS5jdcZepWM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCCD32297; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:17:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 595B532296; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:17:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Pranit Bauva Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v11 09/13] bisect--helper: `bisect_write` shell function in C References: <0102015640423c26-2060fd70-c90d-4de3-ae8c-1801ad160b1c-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <0102015640423cf7-078bef36-54e8-4200-9097-17d95d4f3c40-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:17:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:25:57 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F56BC4B8-58FE-11E6-8CFB-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Pranit Bauva writes: > >> Reimplement the `bisect_write` shell function in C and add a >> `bisect-write` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from >> git-bisect.sh > > Up to around this step we've seen these patches well enough and I > think with another reroll or two, they are in good enough shape to > be split out and frozen for 'next'. We may not be there quite yet, > but I think we are getting pretty close. > > Thanks. By the way, this series applied as a whole seems to break t6030.