From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638BD20285 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 21:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751276AbdH3Vbg (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:31:36 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54546 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750862AbdH3Vbf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:31:35 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777AA974AE; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:31:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=DvtsOOvn97Tp rKfeFEzdxDm8nhE=; b=UNOnKLgutBCAy4Jszhp3qITyqDdnjM5LwOPirKv2i/cV FUjpcSNPKmNI60rFIrQFfxmyeBgmjciEolE4mlyJwo02zzWAwWJ+l0yUP9JsDc8F MFNUL3rWc7xtHByurBqboqbm1UDvTQgxKxVyrQdKT4ug3IPuWVVYE4K3NL0rR6M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=x3ujVQ zgtJRUNc7cSQl99WVdimDoCtXsAEPAnP4Ty/ZBvilPZW3QSFk3F4qk/HW5E1iGz3 5uaGrwomMs4aTZeGjMRe2sFl+GNqe9Z00Xwt7G2E6VCRwS+yv4B0jbN7mM0ODjiE 5MMD7OlJ02KyyW4gV+gVApqIgnlw8wgQR8zVk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F338974AD; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:31:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFF32974AC; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:31:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= Cc: Ben Boeckel , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mention that `eol` can change the dirty status of paths References: <20170822174918.GA1005@megas.kitware.com> <20170823211741.9633-1-mathstuf@gmail.com> <20170824055054.GA32617@tor.lan> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:31:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170824055054.GA32617@tor.lan> ("Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6g?= =?utf-8?Q?ershausen=22's?= message of "Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:50:54 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9737FAA4-8DCA-11E7-B8DC-FE4B1A68708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Torsten B=C3=B6gershausen writes: > How about something like this : > > This attribute sets a specific line-ending style to be used in the > working directory. It enables end-of-line conversion without any > -content checks, effectively setting the `text` attribute. > +content checks, effectively setting the `text` attribute. Note that > +setting this attribute on paths which are in the index with CRLF > +line endings makes the paths to be considered dirty. Is this "always makes them dirty" or "may make them dirty depending on the situation"? =20 If the latter, I'd prefer to see s/makes/may make/ here.